首页> 外文OA文献 >Menganalisis Kesiapan Indonesia dalam Penanggulangan dan Penegakan Hukum Kejahatan Global Berbasis Internet Berdasarkan Undang-undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik
【2h】

Menganalisis Kesiapan Indonesia dalam Penanggulangan dan Penegakan Hukum Kejahatan Global Berbasis Internet Berdasarkan Undang-undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik

机译:基于信息和电子交易法,分析印度尼西亚准备打击和执行基于互联网的全球犯罪法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Utilization of information technology, media and internet-based communications have changed the behavior of the global community and civilization.The world is now flooded with information that is fast, accurate and perfect. The crimes accelerating adverse financial, social, cultural and political. Cybercrimes can be categorized as an extraordinary crime because it has crossed the state border. Cybercrimes prevention can not be done using ordinary legal models only (conventional), but also by a special law design (cyberlaw). Indonesia has had Act 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions. (UU ITE). This study examines and learn more on this cybercerimes prevention policies based on UU ITE. Is the model of the arrangement was in accordance with the principles of the theory of criminalization policies and efforts to what should be done so that UU ITE can be effectively enforced, when compared with the setting cybercrimes committed several countries. The method used is a socio-legal research, legal research that combines science, law and social science (interdisciplinary) With the approach of the principles / legal purposes. Data obtained from secondary data, literature (library recearch). It was found that, setting criminalization is harmonization with the model adopted set forth in the Convention on Cybercrimes, but do not provide specific about pornography and child exploitation. Then the model is to make special rules. ITE Law does not regulate the matter of crime of Phishing and Spamming. The sanctions pidanya still adhered to the classical model (classic school), reflected by the still imposing sanctions of imprisonment and fines and other sanctions are no alternatives. Criminalization policy in UU ITE is not in accordance with the theories of criminal policy is still multiple interpretations and ambiguous, not in accordance with the principles of the model law adopted in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). This law is contrary to the Criminal Code in addition also contrary to the human rights aspects and in granting sanction differ from the prevalence of crime in the setting of a specific nature (lex), like the Election Law, the Child Protection Law, Law on Corruption, the Law Narkoba.Desain criminal policy in this ITE Law can not be effective, especially when compared with the setting cybercrimes committed several countries, namely Azerbaijan, Beylorusia, Georgia, Hungary, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Peru and Russia were put, criminal social work, fines and revocation of certain rights as a way of giving sanctions on crime cybercrimes. In order UU ITE is to be effective then forwards the criminal politics cybercrmes Indonesia needs to adopt the models in these countries. Keywords: Prevention and Law Enforcement, Cybercrimes, ITE Act. Pemanfaatan teknologi informasi, media dan komunikasi berbasis internet telah mengubah perilaku masyarakat maupun peradaban global. Dunia kini dibanjiri informasi yang cepat, akurat dan sempurna. Kejahatannyapun mengalami percepatan yang merugikan finansial,sosial, budaya dan politik. Kejahatan berbasis internet (cybercrimes) dapat dikategorikan sebagai kejahatan luar biasa (extraordinary crimes) karena telah melintasi batas negara (transnational crimes).Penanggulangan cybercrimes tidak dapat dilakukan dengan menggunakan model hukum biasa (konvensional), melainkan dengan melakukan desian hukum khusus (cyberlaw).Indonesia telah memiliki Undang-Undang No.
机译:信息技术,媒体和基于Internet的通信的使用改变了全球社区和文明的行为。当今世界充斥着快速,准确和完美的信息。犯罪加剧了不利的财务,社会,文化和政治后果。由于网络犯罪已经越过国家边界,因此可以归类为非常规犯罪。不能仅使用普通法律模型(传统法律)来预防网络犯罪,还不能通过特殊法律设计(网络法)来进行网络犯罪预防。印度尼西亚已经制定了2008年关于信息和电子交易的第11号法案。 (UU ITE)。这项研究检查并了解有关基于UU ITE的网络犯罪预防政策的更多信息。该安排的模式是否符合刑事定罪政策理论的原则,以及与若干国家设定的网络犯罪相比,应该采取哪些措施才能有效地实施UU ITE。所使用的方法是将法理和社会科学(跨学科)与原则/法律目的相结合的社会法律研究,法律研究。从二级数据,文献(图书馆检索)获得的数据。结果发现,将定罪定为与《网络犯罪公约》所采用的模式相统一,但没有具体说明色情和对儿童的剥削。然后该模型将制定特殊规则。 ITE法没有规范网络钓鱼和垃圾邮件犯罪问题。制裁pidanya仍然坚持古典模式(古典学派),这反映在仍然对监禁和罚款实施制裁的情况下,其他制裁无可替代。 UU ITE中的刑事定罪政策不符合刑事政策的理论,仍然是多种解释和模棱两可的,不符合经济合作与发展组织(OECD)通过的示范法原则。该法律不仅违反了《刑法》,而且还违反了人权方面,并且在授予制裁方面具有特殊性质(lex),例如《选举法》,《儿童保护法》,《儿童权利法》。腐败,纳尔科巴法。此ITE法中的惯用刑事政策不能有效,尤其是与设置了网络犯罪的几个国家(包括阿塞拜疆,贝卢洛斯,格鲁吉亚,匈牙利,哈萨克斯坦,拉脱维亚,秘鲁和俄罗斯)相比,犯罪社会工作,罚款和某些权利的撤销,以此作为对犯罪网络犯罪的制裁手段。为了使UU ITE有效,然后转发刑事政治网络犯罪,印度尼西亚需要在这些国家中采用这种模式。关键字:预防和执法,网络犯罪,ITE法。 Pemanfaatan teknologi信息,媒体dan komunikasi berbasis互联网telah mengubah perilaku masyarakat maupun peradaban全球。 Dunia基尼dibanjiri通知阳cepat,akurat dan sempurna。 Kejahatannyapun mengalami percepatan yang merugikan finanial,sosial,budaya dan politik。 Kejahatan berbasis Internet(网络犯罪)dapat dikategorikan sebagai kejahatan luar biasa(非常规犯罪)karena telah melintasi batas negara(跨国犯罪)。印度尼西亚telah memiliki Undang-Undang No.

著录项

  • 作者

    Riwanto, Agus;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 ID
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号