首页> 外文OA文献 >Empathy, Self-Reflection, and Curriculum Choice
【2h】

Empathy, Self-Reflection, and Curriculum Choice

机译:换位思考,自我反思和课程选择

摘要

We administered the Jefferson Scale of Empathy and the Groningen Reflection Ability Scale to 61 of 64 entering medical students who self-selected a problem-based learning curricular track and to 163 of 198 who self-selected a lecture-based track (response rates of 95.3% and 82.3%, respectively, with no statistically significant differences in mean age or sex). Mean empathy and self-reflection ability scores were significantly higher among students who chose problem-based learning. Women scored higher than men in empathy. Women choosing problem-based learning had the highest empathy scores. Studies comparing students’ performance and achievements in different curricular tracks should consider differences in personal characteristics such as capability for empathy and self-reflection that may cause students to prefer one pedagogic approach over another and affect their outcomes.
机译:我们对64名入学的医学生,他们自行选择了基于问题的学习课程轨迹的Jefferson进行了共情的Jefferson量表和格罗宁根反思能力量表的调查,对198名选择了基于演讲的轨迹的163人中的163人进行了问卷调查(答复率为95.3) %和82.3%,平均年龄或性别无统计学差异)。选择基于问题学习的学生中,平均同理心和自我反思能力得分明显更高。女性在同理心方面的得分高于男性。选择基于问题学习的妇女的共情得分最高。比较学生在不同课程中的表现和成就的研究应考虑个人特征的差异,例如同理心和自我反省的能力,这可能导致学生偏爱一种教学法而不是另一种教学法,并影响他们的学习成绩。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号