首页> 外文OA文献 >Medication safety in collaborative health care settings: an investigation of the impact of information exchange processes in residential aged care facilities
【2h】

Medication safety in collaborative health care settings: an investigation of the impact of information exchange processes in residential aged care facilities

机译:合作医疗机构中的药物安全性:对居住区养老机构中信息交换流程的影响的调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Medication safety is a pressing concern for residential aged care facilities (RACFs). Although failures in information exchange (IE) between multiple providers have been identified as a primary cause of medication errors, there is limited evidence about the way IE impacts on medication safety. This thesis aimed to explicate the IE processes across different stages of RACF medication management and identify the gaps in these processes which increase the risk of medication errors. To achieve these aims, a naturalistic inquiry approach was employed. The research was conducted over two phases within the context of Australian RACF settings. A pilot study was conducted in one RACF to scope and describe the complex IE processes. This was followed by a multi-site study involving three RACFs to investigate gaps in IE processes across key stages of medication management and the associated risks for medication errors. Data were collected over a period of seven months. Methods included direct observations (89 hours), semi-structured interviews (n=23) and artefact analysis. Process mapping and thematic coding were used to analyse the triangulated data. Medication management in RACFs is organised around a series of information-intensive tasks. These tasks are undertaken by the physically distributed team (RACF staff, general practitioners [GPs] and community pharmacists) relying on heterogeneous communication mediums and artefacts. Several gaps were identified in IE processes which often act together to hinder medication management. They include limited information access, double handling, limited communication bandwidth, manual auditing and inadequate information handover. Findings identify that different stages of medication management are executed in isolated organisational islands and do not interact in optimal ways. The absence of coordination mechanisms and a clear division of responsibilities increase medication safety risk. To address these gaps, multifaceted technological (e.g. electronic medication charts) and human (e.g. monitoring by pharmacists) interventions are required. This research presents one of the few studies applying a holistic approach to open the ‘black box’ of IE processes and identify their impact on medication safety in collaborative health care settings. The findings highlight the need to shift the current emphasis on counting medication errors to an examination of underlying processes in order to identify factors which contribute to safe and effective medication management in these environments.
机译:药物安全性是住宅养老机构(RACF)迫切关注的问题。尽管已确定多个提供商之间的信息交换(IE)失败是药物错误的主要原因,但是关于IE影响药物安全性的方式的证据有限。本文旨在阐明RACF药物管理不同阶段的IE流程,并找出这些流程中的差距,这些差距会增加用药错误的风险。为了实现这些目标,采用了自然主义的探究方法。该研究在澳大利亚RACF设置的背景下分两个阶段进行。在一个RACF中进行了一项初步研究,以界定和描述复杂的IE流程。随后是一项涉及三个RACF的多站点研究,以调查药物管理关键阶段的IE流程中的差距以及药物错误的相关风险。在七个月的时间内收集了数据。方法包括直接观察(89小时),半结构化访谈(n = 23)和伪影分析。使用过程映射和主题编码来分析三角数据。 RACF中的药物管理是围绕一系列信息密集型任务组织的。这些任务由物理分布的团队(RACF员工,全科医生[GPs]和社区药剂师)负责,这些团队依靠异构的沟通媒介和人工制品。在IE流程中发现了几个差距,这些差距通常共同作用以阻碍药物管理。它们包括有限的信息访问,双重处理,有限的通信带宽,手动审核和不充分的信息移交。研究发现,药物管理的不同阶段是在孤立的组织孤岛中执行的,并且没有以最佳方式进行交互。缺乏协调机制和明确的职责分工会增加药物安全性风险。为了解决这些差距,需要多方面的技术(例如电子药物图表)和人为干预(例如药剂师的监控)干预。这项研究提出了为数不多的采用整体方法打开IE流程“黑匣子”并确定其对协作医疗机构中药物安全性影响的研究之一。这些发现突出表明,有必要将目前对计数药物错误的重视转移到对基本过程的检查上,以便确定在这些环境中有助于安全有效管理药物的因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号