首页> 外文OA文献 >Perverse and often baffling: the efficacy of Australia#146;s equal employment opportunity regulatory framework
【2h】

Perverse and often baffling: the efficacy of Australia#146;s equal employment opportunity regulatory framework

机译:常有悖常且令人困惑:澳大利亚平等就业机会监管框架的功效

摘要

This thesis investigates why the Equal Opportunity for Women in the Workplace Act 2000 (Commonwealth.) and the associated regulatory framework has not achieved its espoused aims of significantly increasing the advancement of women in Australian organisations. Australian scholarship has identified a range of flaws in this legislation and its capacity to effectively address women’s disadvantage in organisations. The aim of this thesis is to examine the nexus between the legislation and specific organisations in order to develop a deeper understanding of the legislation is being interpreted in different organisational contexts and why such interpretations are serving to undermine legal influence. Accordingly the thesis considers organisational factors that influence the extent to which EEO legislation can effectively address sex segregation in the workplace. By applying the concept of ‘managerialisation of law’ it demonstrates how the response to EEO laws by non-legal professionals and managers affects efforts designed to increase the representation of women at senior levels. The concept of ‘gender culture’ is also used to analyse intra-organisational social forces that influence the efficacy of EEO initiatives. Within this conceptual framework, qualitative data is used to expose the experiences of women managers in organisations. The thesis focuses on three case studies to provide an in-depth investigation of how organisations address gender equity in the workplace and how this varies across different contexts. Each case study represents a different sector of Australia’s economy: the public, private and nonprofit sectors are examined through a university, a financial services organisation and a community service organisation. The organisations in the sample have a public reputation for being representative of Australian ‘best practice’ in gender equity and are amongst the winners from the EOWA’s Annual Best practice for the advancement of women award and the EOWA’s Employer of Choice for Women citation. Therefore an analysis of how they address equal opportunity provides the empirical backbone for understanding how the legislation is refracted through organisational processes. What emerges from these cases is an illustration of a flawed regulatory framework and organisational forces combine to impede EEO efforts and fail to overcome existing barriers that prevent the advancement of women to senior organisational levels.
机译:本论文调查了为什么《 2000年工作场所妇女平等机会法》(联邦)及其相关的监管框架没有实现其在大幅度提高澳大利亚组织中妇女地位方面的既定目标。澳大利亚的奖学金发现了这项立法中的一系列缺陷及其有效解决组织中女性弱势群体的能力。本文的目的是研究立法与特定组织之间的联系,以加深对在不同组织环境中解释法律的理解,以及为什么这种解释会破坏法律影响。因此,本文考虑了组织因素,这些因素影响EEO立法可以有效解决工作场所性别隔离的程度。通过运用“法律管理”的概念,它证明了非法律专业人士和管理人员对EEO法律的反应如何影响旨在增加妇女在高级职位上的代表性的努力。 “性别文化”的概念也用于分析影响EEO计划有效性的组织内部社会力量。在此概念框架内,使用定性数据来揭示组织中女经理的经验。本文着重于三个案例研究,以深入研究组织如何解决工作场所的性别平等以及这在不同情况下如何变化。每个案例研究都代表澳大利亚经济的不同部门:公共,私营和非营利部门通过大学,金融服务组织和社区服务组织进行审查。样本中的组织以其在澳大利亚性别平等方面的“最佳实践”的代表而闻名,并且是EOWA年度提高妇女地位最佳实践奖和EOWA的“女性选择雇主”的获奖者之一引用。因此,对它们如何处理机会均等的分析为理解立法如何通过组织过程进行完善提供了经验基础。从这些案例中可以看出,存在一个有缺陷的监管框架,组织力量联合起来阻碍了EEO的努力,并且未能克服阻碍女性晋升为高级组织级别的现有障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号