Lean strategies have been developed to eliminate or reduce manufacturing waste and thus improve operational efficiency in manufacturing processes. However, implementing lean strategies requires a large amount of resources and, in practice, manufacturers encounter difficulties in selecting appropriate lean strategies within their resource constraints. There is currently no systematic methodology available for selecting appropriate lean strategies within a manufacturer's resource constraints. In the lean transformation process, it is also critical to measure the current and desired leanness levels in order to clearly evaluate lean implementation efforts. Despite the fact that many lean strategies are utilized to reduce or eliminate manufacturing waste, little effort has been directed towards properly assessing the leanness of manufacturing organizations. In practice, a single or specific group of metrics (either qualitative or quantitative) will only partially measure the overall leanness. Existing leanness assessment methodologies do not offer a comprehensive evaluation method, integrating both quantitative and qualitative lean measures into a single quantitative value for measuring the overall leanness of an organization.ududThis research aims to develop mathematical models and a systematic methodology for selecting appropriate lean strategies and evaluating the leanness levels in manufacturing organizations. Mathematical models were formulated and a methodology was developed for selecting appropriate lean strategies within manufacturers' limited amount of available resources to reduce their identified wastes. A leanness assessment model was developed by using the fuzzy concept to assess the leanness level and to recommend an optimum leanness value for a manufacturing organization. In the proposed leanness assessment model, both quantitative and qualitative input factors have been taken into account.ududBased on program developed in MATLAB and C#, a decision support tool (DST) was developed for decision makers to select lean strategies and evaluate the leanness value based on the proposed models and methodology hence sustain the lean implementation efforts. A case study was conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of these proposed models and methodology. Case study results suggested that out of 10 wastes identified, the case organization (ABC Limited) is able to improve a maximum of six wastes from the selected workstation within their resource limitations. The selected wastes are: unnecessary motion, setup time, unnecessary transportation, inappropriate processing, work in process and raw material inventory and suggested lean strategies are: 5S, Just-In-Time, Kanban System, the Visual Management System (VMS), Cellular Manufacturing, Standard Work Process using method-time measurement (MTM), and Single Minute Exchange of Die (SMED).ududFrom the suggested lean strategies, the impact of 5S was demonstrated by measuring the leanness level of two different situations in ABC. After that, MTM was suggested as a standard work process for further improvement of the current leanness value. The initial status of the organization showed a leanness value of 0.12. By applying 5S, the leanness level significantly improved to reach 0.19 and the simulation of MTM as a standard work method shows the leanness value could be improved to 0.31. The optimum leanness value of ABC was calculated to be 0.64. These leanness values provided a quantitative indication of the impacts of improvement initiatives in terms of the overall leanness level to the case organization. Sensitivity analsysis and a t-test were also performed to validate the model proposed.ududThis research advances the current knowledge base by developing mathematical models and methodologies to overcome lean strategy selection and leanness assessment problems. By selecting appropriate lean strategies, a manufacturer can better prioritize implementation efforts and resources to maximize the benefits of implementing lean strategies in their organization. The leanness index is used to evaluate an organization's current (before lean implementation) leanness state against the state after lean implementation and to establish benchmarking (the optimum leanness state). Hence, this research provides a continuous improvement tool for a lean manufacturing organization.
展开▼
机译:已经开发了精益策略来消除或减少制造浪费,从而提高制造过程中的运营效率。然而,实施精益策略需要大量资源,并且在实践中,制造商在其资源限制内选择合适的精益策略时会遇到困难。当前,尚无系统的方法可用于在制造商的资源限制内选择合适的精益策略。在精益转换过程中,测量当前和所需的精益水平以清楚地评估精益实施工作也很关键。尽管事实是采用了许多精益策略来减少或消除制造浪费,但很少有人致力于正确评估制造组织的精益度。在实践中,单个或特定的度量标准组(定性或定量)将仅部分测量总体瘦度。现有的精益评估方法没有提供一种综合的评估方法,该方法将定量和定性的精益度量都集成到一个定量值中,以测量组织的整体精益。 ud ud此研究旨在开发数学模型和系统的方法来选择合适的方法。精益策略并评估制造组织中的精益水平。建立了数学模型,并开发了一种方法,以在制造商有限的可用资源范围内选择适当的精益策略,以减少其识别出的浪费。通过使用模糊概念开发瘦度评估模型,以评估瘦度水平并为制造组织推荐最佳瘦度值。 ud ud基于MATLAB和C#开发的程序,开发了决策支持工具(DST),供决策者选择精益策略并评估其精益度。因此,基于提议的模型和方法的精益价值将维持精益实施的努力。进行了案例研究,以证明这些提议的模型和方法的有效性。案例研究结果表明,在确定的10种废物中,案例组织(ABC Limited)能够在资源有限的情况下最多从选定的工作站中改善6种废物。选择的废物是:不必要的移动,准备时间,不必要的运输,不适当的处理,在制品和原材料库存,建议的精益策略是:5S,即时,看板系统,视觉管理系统(VMS),蜂窝制造,使用方法时间测量(MTM)的标准工作流程和模具的单分钟更换(SMED)。 ud ud从建议的精益策略中,通过测量ABC中两种不同情况的精益水平来证明5S的影响。此后,建议将MTM作为标准工作流程,以进一步提高当前的瘦度值。该组织的初始状态显示的倾斜度值为0.12。通过应用5S,精益水平显着提高到0.19,并且作为标准工作方法的MTM仿真显示,精益值可以提高到0.31。经计算,ABC的最佳倾斜度值为0.64。这些精益度值从整体精益度水平向案例组织的角度提供了改进计划的影响的定量指示。 ud ud本研究通过开发数学模型和方法来克服精益策略选择和精益评估问题,从而提高了当前的知识库。通过选择适当的精益战略,制造商可以更好地确定实施工作和资源的优先级,以最大程度地在其组织中实施精益战略。精益指数用于相对于精益实施后的状态评估组织的当前(精益实施之前)的精益状态,并用于建立基准(最佳精益状态)。因此,这项研究为精益生产组织提供了持续改进的工具。
展开▼