首页> 外文OA文献 >From rights to responsibilities : reconceptualising carbon sequestration rights in Australia
【2h】

From rights to responsibilities : reconceptualising carbon sequestration rights in Australia

机译:从权利到责任:重新构想澳大利亚的碳固存权

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Biosequestration of carbon in trees, forests and vegetation is a key method for mitigating climate change in Australia. To facilitate this, all States have enacted legislation for carbon sequestration rights, separating commercial rights in carbon from ownership of the land, trees and vegetation in which the carbon is sequestered. Ownership of carbon sequestration rights under state law is a prerequisite for the issue of carbon credits to proponents of ‘eligible sequestration offsets projects’ under the Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Act 2011 (Cth) (‘Carbon Farming Act’). This article examines the extent to which current State carbon sequestration rights support the offsets regime established by the Carbon Farming Act. The Commonwealth Act is concerned with allocating responsibilities to ensure the maintenance of the carbon sequestration, while the State Acts confer commercial rights in the carbon and leave the responsibilities to be allocated by private agreements. The carbon sequestration rights as defined by state laws do not confer the rights of access and management over land that a project proponent needs in order to discharge its responsibilities to maintain the carbon sequestration.
机译:树木,森林和植被中碳的生物固存是缓解澳大利亚气候变化的关键方法。为了促进这一点,所有国家都颁布了关于碳固存权的立法,将碳的商业权与碳固存的土地,树木和植被的所有权分开。根据《 2011年碳信用额度(碳农计划)法》(“碳农业法”),向“合格的碳汇抵消项目”的支持者发放碳信用额是根据州法律拥有碳固存权的前提。本文研究了当前州的碳固存权在多大程度上支持《碳农业法》所建立的抵消机制。 《联邦法》涉及分配责任以确保碳封存的维持,而《州法》赋予碳以商业权利,而责任则由私人协议来分配。州法律规定的固碳权利并不赋予项目支持者履行其维护固碳职责所需的土地使用权和管理权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号