首页> 外文OA文献 >Waste Not, Want Not: Managing Perishables in Small and Medium Retail Enterprises
【2h】

Waste Not, Want Not: Managing Perishables in Small and Medium Retail Enterprises

机译:不浪费,不浪费:管理中小型零售企业中的易腐品

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose of this paper: Recent literature indicates that around one third of perishable products finish as waste (Mena et al., 2014): 60% of this waste can be classified as avoidable (EC, 2010) suggesting logistics and operational inefficiencies along the supply chain. In developed countries perishable products are predominantly wasted in wholesale and retail (Gustavsson et al., 2011) due to customer demand uncertainty the errors and delays in the supply chain (Fernie and Sparks, 2014). While research on logistics of large retail supply chains is well documented, research on retail small and medium enterprises’ (SMEs) capabilities to prevent and manage waste of perishable products is in its infancy (c.f. Ellegaard, 2008) and needs further exploration. In our study, we investigate the retail logistics practice of small food retailers, the factors that contribute to perishable products waste and the barriers and opportunities of SMEs in retail logistics to preserve product quality and participate in reverse logistics flows. Design/methodology/approach: As research on waste of perishable products for SMEs is scattered, we focus on identifying key variables that contribute to the creation of avoidable waste. Secondly we identify patterns of waste creation at the retail level and its possibilities for value added recovery. We use explorative case studies (Eisenhardt, 1989) and compare four SMEs and one large retailer that operate in a developed market. To get insights into specificities of SMEs that affect retail logistics practice, we select two types of food retailers: specialised (e.g. greengrocers and bakers) and general (e.g. convenience store that sells perishable products as a part of the assortment) Findings: Our preliminary findings indicate that there is a difference between large retailers and SME retailers in factors that contribute to the waste creation, as well as opportunities for value added recovery of products. While more factors appear to affect waste creation and management at large retailers, a small number of specific factors appears to affect SMEs. Similarly, large retailers utilise a range of practices to reduce risks of product perishability and short shelf life, manage demand, and manage reverse logistics practices. Retail SMEs on the other hand have limited options to address waste creation and value added recovery. However, our findings show that specialist SMEs could successfully minimize waste and even create possibilities for value added recovery of perishable products. Data indicates that business orientation of the SME, the buyersupplier relationship, and an extent of adoption of lean principles in retail coupled with SME resources, product specific regulations and support from local authorities for waste management or partnerships with other organizations determine extent of successful preservation of a product quality and value added recovery.Value: Our contribution to the SCM academic literature is threefold: first, we identify major factors that contribute to the generation waste of perishable products in retail environment; second, we identify possibilities for value added recovery for perishable products and third, we present opportunities and challenges for SME retailers to manage or participate in activities of value added recovery. Our findings contribute to theory by filling a gap in the literature that considers product quality preservation and value added recovery in the context of retail logistics and SMEs. Research limitations/implications: Our findings are limited to insights from five case studies of retail companies that operate within a developed market. To improve on generalisability, we intend to increase the number of cases and include data obtained from the suppliers and organizations involved in reverse logistics flows (e.g. local authorities, charities, etc.). Practical implications: With this paper, we contribute to the improvement of retail logistics and operations in SMEs which constitute over 99% of business activities in UK (Rhodes, 2015). Our findings will help retail managers and owners to better understand the possibilities for value added recovery, investigate a range of logistics and retail strategies suitable for the specificities of SME environment and, ultimately, improve their profitability and sustainability.
机译:本文的目的:最近的文献表明,约有三分之一的易腐产品最终以废物的形式出现(Mena等,2014):60%的废物可以归类为可避免的(EC,2010),表明供应过程中物流和运营效率低下链。在发达国家,由于客户需求不确定性,供应链中的错误和延误,易腐产品主要在批发和零售中被浪费(Gustavsson等,2011)。尽管对大型零售供应链的物流的研究已有大量文献记载,但对零售中小型企业(SME)预防和管理易腐产品浪费的能力的研究仍处于起步阶段(参见Ellegaard,2008年),需要进一步探索。在我们的研究中,我们调查了小型食品零售商的零售物流实践,造成易腐产品浪费的因素以及中小型企业在零售物流中维护产品质量和参与逆向物流流程的障碍和机会。设计/方法/方法:由于对中小型企业的易腐产品废物的研究分散,因此我们着重于确定有助于产生可避免废物的关键变量。其次,我们确定了零售一级废物产生的模式及其增值回收的可能性。我们使用探索性案例研究(Eisenhardt,1989),比较了四个在发达市场经营的中小型企业和一个大型零售商。为了深入了解影响零售物流实践的中小型企业的特殊性,我们选择了两种类型的食品零售商:专门的(例如,蔬菜水果店和面包店)和一般的(例如,出售易腐产品作为其一部分的便利店)食品调查结果:我们的初步调查结果表明大型零售商和中小型企业零售商在造成废物产生的因素以及产品增值回收的机会方面存在差异。虽然更多的因素似乎会影响大型零售商的废物产生和管理,但少数特定因素似乎会影响中小型企业。同样,大型零售商利用一系列实践来降低产品易腐烂和货架期短的风险,管理需求并管理逆向物流实践。另一方面,零售中小型企业在解决废物产生和增值回收方面的选择有限。但是,我们的发现表明,专业的中小企业可以成功地减少浪费,甚至为易腐产品的增值回收创造可能性。数据表明,中小型企业的业务定位,买家与供应商的关系,零售中采用精益原则的程度,中小型企业的资源,特定产品的法规以及地方当局对废物管理或与其他组织的合作伙伴关系的支持,决定了中小型企业成功保存的程度。价值:我们对SCM学术文献的贡献是三方面的:第一,我们确定导致零售环境中易腐产品产生浪费的主要因素;第二,我们确定了易腐产品增值回收的可能性,第三,我们为中小企业零售商提供了管理或参与增值回收活动的机遇和挑战。我们的发现通过填补在零售物流和中小企业背景下考虑产品质量保存和增值回收的文献中的空白,为理论做出了贡献。研究的局限性/意义:我们的发现仅限于在发达市场中运营的零售公司的五个案例研究中得出的见解。为了提高通用性,我们打算增加案件数量,并包括从涉及逆向物流流程的供应商和组织(例如地方当局,慈善机构等)获得的数据。实际意义:通过本文,我们为改善中小型企业的零售物流和运营做出了贡献,这些活动占英国业务活动的99%以上(Rhodes,2015年)。我们的发现将帮助零售管理者和所有者更好地了解增值回收的可能性,研究一系列适合中小型企业环境的物流和零售策略,并最终提高其盈利能力和可持续性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号