This paper focuses on the nature of integrity management in contemporary UK public life. Despite traditionally high standards of integrity in the public service, it has recently been argued that the UK’s National Integrity System resembles a patchwork quilt of poorly defined institutional roles, questionable independence, and contested notions of how best to disseminate and uphold ethical practice. The paper traces how a relatively enduring characteristic known as the British public service ethos (PSE), which places emphasis on informal codes of conduct and moral integrity, has evolved within broader systemic changes to the style of public service delivery. It is argued that pressures to decentralise public service delivery sit in tension with, and feed into, piecemeal attempts to centralise and codify integrity management. This dynamic is presented in terms of the tension between a compliance-based and a values-based approach to integrity management.\ud\udThe paper is structured in three parts. The first part traces the evolution of the British public service ethos, tracing continuities and changes, in order to situate integrity management in both its institutional and structural context. The second part engages with recent academic debates and recommendations from key bodies such as the Committee on Standards in Public Life (CSPL) and the House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee (PASC). It is shown how recommendations to create independent statutory bodies of ethical oversight have not been fully implemented. The third part seeks to place the UK experience within the broader literature surrounding National Integrity Systems and New Public Management. In doing so the paper reflects on ways we can understand the concept and application of integrity management within and beyond the UK experience.
展开▼
机译:本文着眼于当代英国公共生活中诚信管理的本质。尽管传统上公共服务中的诚信度很高,但最近有人争辩说,英国的国家诚信体系类似于拼凑而成的被褥,其机构角色定义不清,可疑的独立性以及关于如何最好地传播和维护道德实践的观念存在争议。本文追溯了一个相对持久的特征,即英国公共服务精神(PSE),该特征强调非正式的行为准则和道德诚信,是如何在对公共服务提供方式进行更广泛的系统性变化的情况下演变的。有人认为,分散公共服务提供的压力与集中和编纂廉正管理的零碎尝试紧绷在一起,并助其一臂之力。这种动态是通过基于合规性和基于价值的完整性管理方法之间的张力来表示的。\ ud \ ud本文分为三个部分。第一部分追溯英国公共服务理念的演变,追踪连续性和变化,以便将廉正管理置于其体制和结构背景下。第二部分涉及一些重要机构最近的学术辩论和建议,这些机构包括公共生活标准委员会(CSPL)和下议院公共行政选择委员会(PASC)。它显示了如何建立独立的法定道德监督机构的建议尚未得到充分执行。第三部分旨在将英国的经验纳入围绕国家诚信体系和新公共管理的更广泛文献中。在此过程中,本文思考了在英国经验内外我们可以理解完整性管理的概念和应用的方式。
展开▼