首页> 外文OA文献 >Beyond mild cognitive impairment: vascular cognitive impairment, no dementia (VCIND)
【2h】

Beyond mild cognitive impairment: vascular cognitive impairment, no dementia (VCIND)

机译:轻度认知障碍之外:血管性认知障碍,无痴呆(VCIND)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Identifying the causes of dementia is important in the search for effective preventative and treatment strategies. The concept of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), as prodromal dementia, has been useful but remains controversial since in population-based studies it appears to be a limited predictor of progression to dementia. Recognising the relative contribution of neurodegenerative and vascular causes, as well as their interrelationship, may enhance predictive accuracy. The concept of vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) has been introduced to describe the spectrum of cognitive change related to vascular causes from early cognitive decline to dementia. A recent review of this concept highlighted the need for diagnostic criteria that encompass the full range of the VCI construct. However, very little is known regarding the mildest stage of VCI, generally termed 'vascular cognitive impairment, no dementia' (VCIND). Whether mild cognitive change in the context of neurodegenerative pathologies is distinct from that in the context of cerebrovascular diseases is not known. This is key to the definition of VCIND and whether it is possible to identify this state. Distinguishing between vascular (that is, VCIND) and non-vascular (that is, MCI) cognitive disorders and determining how well each might predict dementia may not be possible due to the overlap in pathologies observed in the older population. Here, we review the concept of VCIND in an effort to identify recent developments and areas of controversy in nosology and the application of VCIND for screening individuals at increased risk of dementia secondary to vascular disease and its risk factors.
机译:确定痴呆症的原因对于寻找有效的预防和治疗策略很重要。作为前驱性痴呆,轻度认知障碍(MCI)的概念很有用,但仍存在争议,因为在基于人群的研究中,它似乎是痴呆发展的有限预测因子。认识到神经变性和血管病因的相对作用及其相互关系,可能会提高预测的准确性。引入了血管性认知障碍(VCI)的概念,以描述与从早期认知能力下降到痴呆症的血管原因相关的认知变化的范围。最近对该概念的回顾强调了对诊断标准的需求,该诊断标准应涵盖整个VCI构建体。但是,关于VCI最轻的阶段(通常称为“血管性认知障碍,无痴呆”)(VCIND)知之甚少。尚不清楚神经退行性病变情况下的轻度认知变化是否不同于脑血管疾病情况下的认知变化。这是VCIND定义以及是否有可能识别此状态的关键。由于在老年人群中观察到的病理学重叠,因此无法区分血管性(即VCIND)和非血管性(即MCI)认知障碍,并无法确定它们各自对痴呆症的预测程度。在这里,我们回顾了VCIND的概念,以识别疾病学的最新发展和争议领域,以及VCIND在筛查血管病继发性痴呆风险增加的个体及其风险因素中的应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号