首页> 外文OA文献 >The impact of surgery on global climate : a carbon footprinting study of operating theatres in three health systems
【2h】

The impact of surgery on global climate : a carbon footprinting study of operating theatres in three health systems

机译:手术对全球气候的影响:三个卫生系统中手术室的碳足迹研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundududClimate change is a major global public health priority. The delivery of health-care services generates considerable greenhouse gas emissions. Operating theatres are a resource-intensive subsector of health care, with high energy demands, consumable throughput, and waste volumes. The environmental impacts of these activities are generally accepted as necessary for the provision of quality care, but have not been examined in detail. In this study, we estimate the carbon footprint of operating theatres in hospitals in three health systems.ududMethodsududSurgical suites at three academic quaternary-care hospitals were studied over a 1-year period in Canada (Vancouver General Hospital, VGH), the USA (University of Minnesota Medical Center, UMMC), and the UK (John Radcliffe Hospital, JRH). Greenhouse gas emissions were estimated using primary activity data and applicable emissions factors, and reported according to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.ududFindingsududSite greenhouse gas evaluations were done between Jan 1 and Dec 31, 2011. The surgical suites studied were found to have annual carbon footprints of 5 187 936 kg of CO2 equivalents (CO2e) at JRH, 4 181 864 kg of CO2e at UMMC, and 3 218 907 kg of CO2e at VGH. On a per unit area basis, JRH had the lowest carbon intensity at 1702 kg CO2e/m2, compared with 1951 kg CO2e/m2 at VGH and 2284 kg CO2e/m2 at UMMC. Based on case volumes at all three sites, VGH had the lowest carbon intensity per operation at 146 kg CO2e per case compared with 173 kg CO2e per case at JRH and 232 kg CO2e per case at UMMC. Anaesthetic gases and energy consumption were the largest sources of greenhouse gas emissions. Preferential use of desflurane resulted in a ten-fold difference in anaesthetic gas emissions between hospitals. Theatres were found to be three to six times more energy-intense than the hospital as a whole, primarily due to heating, ventilation, and air conditioning requirements. Overall, the carbon footprint of surgery in the three countries studied is estimated to be 9·7 million tonnes of CO2e per year.ududInterpretationududOperating theatres are an appreciable source of greenhouse gas emissions. Emissions reduction strategies including avoidance of desflurane and occupancy-based ventilation have the potential to lessen the climate impact of surgical services without compromising patient safety.
机译:背景 ud ud气候变化是全球主要的公共卫生重点。提供保健服务会产生大量的温室气体排放。手术室是医疗保健的资源密集型子领域,具有很高的能源需求,消耗的生产量和废物量。这些活动对环境的影响通常被认为是提供优质护理所必需的,但尚未进行详细检查。在这项研究中,我们估算了三个卫生系统中医院手术室的碳足迹。 ud udMethods ud ud在加拿大为期一年的研究中,对三所学术四级护理医院的手术室进行了研究(温哥华总医院, VGH),美国(明尼苏达大学医学中心,UMMC)和英国(约翰·雷德克里夫医院,JRH)。使用主要活动数据和适用的排放因子估算温室气体排放量,并根据《温室气体议定书》进行报告。 ud udFindings ud udSite温室气体评估于2011年1月1日至12月31日进行。在JRH,发现其年度碳足迹为5×187 936 kg CO2e(UM2),在UMMC为4×181 864 kg CO2e,在VGH为3×218 907 kg CO2e。以单位面积计,JRH的碳强度最低,为1702 kg CO2e / m2,相比之下,VGH为1951 kg CO2e / m2,而UMMC为2284 kg CO2e / m2。根据三个地点的病例数量,VGH的每次操作碳强度最低,为146 kg CO2e,而JRH为173 kg CO2e,而UMMC为232 kg CO2e。麻醉气体和能源消耗是温室气体排放的最大来源。优先使用地氟醚导致医院之间麻醉气体排放量相差十倍。发现剧院比整个医院的能源消耗要高三到六倍,这主要是由于需要暖气,通风和空调。总体而言,在研究的三个国家中,手术的碳足迹估计为每年9·700万吨CO2e。 ud ud解释 ud ud手术室是温室气体排放的重要来源。包括避免使用地氟醚和基于乘员的通风在内的减排策略有可能在不影响患者安全的情况下减轻外科手术对气候的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号