首页> 外文OA文献 >Intercomparison of global river discharge simulations focusing on dam operation --- Part II: Multiple models analysis in two case-study river basins, Missouri-Mississippi and Green-Colorado
【2h】

Intercomparison of global river discharge simulations focusing on dam operation --- Part II: Multiple models analysis in two case-study river basins, Missouri-Mississippi and Green-Colorado

机译:侧重于大坝运行的全球河流排放模拟的比对-第二部分:密苏里州密西西比州和科罗拉多州两个案例研究流域的多模型分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We performed a twofold intercomparison of river discharge regulated by dams under multiple meteorological forcings among multiple global hydrological models for a historical period by simulation. Paper II provides an intercomparison of river discharge simulated by five hydrological models under four meteorological forcings. This is the first global multimodel intercomparison study on dam-regulated river flow. Although the simulations were conducted globally, the Missouri-Mississippi and Green-Colorado Rivers were chosen as case-study sites in this study. The hydrological models incorporate generic schemes of dam operation, not specific to a certain dam. We examined river discharge on a longitudinal section of river channels to investigate the effects of dams on simulated discharge, especially at the seasonal time scale. We found that the magnitude of dam regulation differed considerably among the hydrological models. The difference was attributable not only to dam operation schemes but also to the magnitude of simulated river discharge flowing into dams. That is, although a similar algorithm of dam operation schemes was incorporated in different hydrological models, the magnitude of dam regulation substantially differed among the models. Intermodel discrepancies tended to decrease toward the lower reaches of these river basins, which means model dependence is less significant toward lower reaches. These case-study results imply that, intermodel comparisons of river discharge should be made at different locations along the river’s course to critically examine the performance of hydrological models because the performance can vary with the locations.
机译:通过模拟,我们对一个历史时期内多个全球水文模型之间在多种气象强迫下由大坝调节的河流流量进行了双重比较。论文二提供了在四个气象强迫下由五个水文模型模拟的河流流量的比较。这是第一个关于大坝调节河流流量的全球多模型比对研究。尽管模拟是在全球范围内进行的,但本研究仍选择了密苏里州-密西西比河和科罗拉多州绿色河作为案例研究地点。水文模型结合了大坝运行的通用方案,而并非特定于某座大坝。我们检查了河道纵断面的河流流量,以研究大坝对模拟流量的影响,尤其是在季节性时间尺度上。我们发现,在水文模型之间,大坝调节的幅度差异很大。这种差异不仅归因于大坝运行方案,还归因于流入大坝的模拟河流流量的大小。也就是说,尽管在不同的水文模型中采用了类似的大坝运行方案算法,但大坝调节的幅度在这些模型之间却大不相同。模型间差异趋向于向这些流域的下游减小,这意味着对下游的模型依赖性较小。这些案例研究结果表明,应在沿河道的不同位置进行河流流量的模型间比较,以严格检查水文模型的性能,因为性能会随位置而变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号