首页> 外文OA文献 >Wheelchair Securement and Occupant Restraint: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Use and Effect on Motor Vehicle Related Injuries
【2h】

Wheelchair Securement and Occupant Restraint: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Use and Effect on Motor Vehicle Related Injuries

机译:轮椅固定和乘员约束:使用剖析和对机动车相关伤害的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: The goal of this project was to describe the characteristics related to motor vehicle transportation among wheelchair users, who remain in their wheelchair while in the vehicle. Particular focus was placed on identifying how these individuals utilize occupant restraint and wheelchair securement devices. Also, the study examined the epidemiology of motor vehicle related injuries, and reports on the relationship between these injuries and the identified use of occupant restraint and wheelchair securement systems.Methods: A 12-page survey was completed, via mail, by 336 wheelchair users, who self-reported that they remain seated in their wheelchair at least some point in their transportation use. These individuals were recruited through various nationwide disability related service and advocacy organizations, as well as through disability related internet message boards. Descriptive, chi-square and t-test analysis was completed using SPSS statistical software. Results: The results of this study show that traveling as a private vehicle passenger is the most common manner in which motor vehicle transportation is used by wheelchair occupants, with 70.2% of the sample population reporting to using this mode within the past month and 50.0% reporting this mode as their primary means of transportation. Limited significant difference existed in regard to subject's gender, age, disability or wheelchair type and the reported use of either an occupant restraint device or a wheelchair securement system. There were also limited significant findings seen in regard to the use of either an occupant restraint device or wheelchair securement system and the occurrence/severity of a motor vehicle crash, or non-crash related injury. Finally, in regard to motor vehicle related adverse events that resulted in an injury, descriptive statistics showed that there were limited events (crash: n = 15, non-crash: n = 71), with even less resulting in an injury requiring the need to seek medical attention (crash: n = 10, non-crash: n = 9).Conclusion: This study is one of the first efforts to describe the real-world transportation characteristics of wheelchair-seated passengers, as well as an examination of the relationship between the use of either occupant restraints or wheelchair securement devices and the occurrence of motor vehicle related injuries. These data demonstrate that private vehicles are the most widely used form of motor vehicle transportation, suggesting that research focused in this area may be beneficial. Also, limited significant findings were seen in regard to the relationships between the use of either an occupant restraint or wheelchair securement, independent of each other, and the occurrence of motor vehicle related injuries. These results may be interpreted in two ways 1) that these safety systems are not being used effectively, or 2) that use of an occupant restraint and wheelchair securement independent of one another may not reduce injury risk in a motor vehicle crash or non-crash incident. The analysis of the use of a 3-point occupant restraint, together with a forward facing wheelchair securement system, as recommended by the SAE J2249, may produce different results. It should also be noted that based on descriptive statistics alone, it is evident that for those individuals who were injured severely enough in a non-crash incident to require medical attention, there was limited reported usage of wheelchair securement and occupant restraints. These findings may suggest that the use of such devices may decrease the number of severe non-crash related injuries. Based on the limitations of this study and trends seen within the descriptive statistics, more research in this area is required to develop more inferential findings between the use of these devices and the occurrence of injuries related to motor vehicle transportation.
机译:目的:该项目的目的是描述轮椅使用者中与机动车运输有关的特征,这些使用者在轮椅上停留在轮椅上。特别着重于确定这些人如何利用乘员约束和轮椅固定装置。此外,该研究还检查了机动车相关伤害的流行病学,并报告了这些伤害与确定的乘员约束系统和轮椅固定系统使用之间的关系。方法:336名轮椅使用者通过邮件完成了长达12页的调查,他自我报告说他们至少在坐轮椅时坐在轮椅上。这些人是通过各种全国性的残疾人相关服务和倡导组织以及与残疾人相关的互联网留言板招募的。使用SPSS统计软件完成描述性,卡方检验和t检验分析。结果:这项研究的结果表明,以私家车乘客出行是轮椅乘员最常使用的交通工具,在过去一个月中,有70.2%的样本人群报告使用这种方式,而50.0%报告此模式是他们的主要交通工具。在受试者的性别,年龄,残疾或轮椅类型以及所报告的使用乘员约束装置或轮椅固定系统方面存在有限的显着差异。关于使用乘员约束装置或轮椅固定系统以及发生机动车撞车或与撞车无关的伤害的严重性,也发现了有限的重要发现。最后,关于导致伤害的与机动车相关的不良事件,描述性统计显示,事件有限(碰撞:n = 15,非碰撞:n = 71),甚至更少,导致受伤需要寻求医疗救护(崩溃:n = 10,非崩溃:n = 9)。结论:这项研究是描述轮椅上坐着的乘客在现实世界中的交通特征以及对乘客的检查的首次尝试之一。乘员约束装置或轮椅固定装置的使用与机动车相关伤害的发生之间的关系。这些数据表明,私家车是最广泛使用的机动交通工具,这表明专注于这一领域的研究可能是有益的。此外,在使用彼此独立的乘员约束装置或轮椅固定装置与发生与机动车辆相关的伤害之间的关系方面,仅发现了有限的重要发现。这些结果可以通过两种方式来解释:1)这些安全系统未得到有效使用,或2)相互独立地使用乘员约束装置和轮椅固定装置可能不会降低机动车碰撞或非碰撞中的伤害风险事件。根据SAE J2249的建议,对三点式乘员约束系统的使用以及前向轮椅固定系统的使用进行的分析可能会得出不同的结果。还应注意,仅根据描述性统计数据,很明显,对于那些在非碰撞事件中受伤严重到需要医疗救助的人,使用轮椅固定装置和乘员约束装置的报道有限。这些发现可能表明使用此类设备可能会减少严重的非碰撞相关伤害的数量。基于这项研究的局限性以及描述性统计数据中的趋势,需要进行更多的研究,才能在使用这些设备与与汽车运输有关的伤害发生之间得出更多的推论性发现。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rotko Kathrine Ashley;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2005
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号