首页> 外文OA文献 >WHICH METHOD IS THE BEST FOR DETERMININGudTHE END-POINT IN STRONG ACID – STRONG BASE TITRATIONS: USING A PH INDICATOR, MEASURING TEMPERATURE CHANGE, OR MEASURING RESISTANCE?
【2h】

WHICH METHOD IS THE BEST FOR DETERMININGudTHE END-POINT IN STRONG ACID – STRONG BASE TITRATIONS: USING A PH INDICATOR, MEASURING TEMPERATURE CHANGE, OR MEASURING RESISTANCE?

机译:哪种方法最适合确定 ud强酸-强碱滴定法的终点:使用pH指示剂,测量温度变化还是测量电阻?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In this essay, three of the methods for finding the end-point in acid-base titrations areudexamined and compared. The titration is done with 0.1 molar NaOH as the titrant and 0.1udmolar HCl as the analyte. The methods are: Using phenolphthalein as an indicator, measuringudthe temperature change, measuring the resistance of the analyte. The goal is to determineudwhich method among these three is the most accurate, in order to find out which method canudbe used in the absence of a pH meter.udIn each method, a pH meter is also used to see the actual pH when the method comesudto the end-point. The variables for each experiment are graphed, together with pH, and then atudthe end-point of the methods the pH is found using graphing software. The mean values forudeach method are calculated and compared with the literature value of the equivalence pointudfor this titration, which is 7. The indicator method is proved to be the best among these threeudwith a very low error percentage, the resistance method comes second, however it has a highuderror percentage and is not very appropriate for using in this titration. The temperature methoduddid not give any sign of reaching the end-point; therefore its error percentage could not beudcalculated and proved that it is not suitable for this titration. For titrations with differentudconditions all the methods have to be tested again before deciding which is the best.udTo sum up, amongst these methods, using phenolphthalein as an indicator of the endpointudis the best method to use in the absence of a pH meter, for this acid-base titration.
机译:在本文中,对三种酸碱滴定终点方法进行了比较。用0.1摩尔的NaOH作为滴定剂和0.1 udmolar HCl作为分析物进行滴定。方法是:使用酚酞作为指示剂,测量温度变化,测量分析物的电阻。目的是确定这三种方法中哪一种是最准确的,以便找出在没有pH计的情况下可以使用哪种方法。 ud每种方法中,也都使用pH计来查看实际方法。方法达到终点时的pH。绘制每个实验的变量以及pH值,然后在方法的终点使用绘制软件找到pH。计算 udeach方法的平均值,并将其与该滴定的等效点 ud的文献值进行比较,即7。指示剂方法被证明是这三种方法中的最佳方法,误差百分比非常低,电阻方法排在第二位,但是它的错误百分率很高,不太适合用于该滴定。温度方法没有给出任何到达终点的迹象;因此无法计算其误差百分比,并证明它不适合此滴定。对于具有不同 udconditions的滴定,必须先再次测试所有方法,然后再确定哪种方法是最佳的。 ud总结一下,在这些方法中,使用酚酞作为终点的指标是在没有色谱柱的情况下使用的最佳方法。 pH计,用于此酸碱滴定。

著录项

  • 作者

    Balkancı Arda;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号