首页> 外文OA文献 >Appropriate comparator in national treatment under international investment law :relevance of GATT/WTO, EU and international human rights jurisprudences
【2h】

Appropriate comparator in national treatment under international investment law :relevance of GATT/WTO, EU and international human rights jurisprudences

机译:根据国际投资法在国民待遇方面的适当比较者:关贸总协定/世贸组织,欧盟和国际人权法学的相关性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The minimalist state of the national treatment provision in the investment treaties has provided limited guidance for the tribunals for interpretation. As a result, there were inconsistencies in the interpretation of national treatment, in particular the question of likeness. This thesis aims to develop the doctrinal understanding of the determination of appropriate comparator guided by the underlying philosophies, historical evolution and relevant investment decisions. The methods applied in this thesis are doctrinal and comparative studies of international investment law and the compared jurisprudences. A major part of this thesis is dedicated to examine the comparison and relevance of the GATT/WTO, EU and international human rights law in the interpretation of discrimination based on nationality. The interpretative methods applied by the respective jurisprudences in determining likeness and related questions of legitimate regulatory measures are examined to see whether there are lessons that could be learnt in the interpretation of national treatment in investment law. The finding of this thesis confirms that there is potentially a range of insightful guidance from the jurisprudences under comparison which could provide a structured understanding of national treatment in international investment law. The observations put forth highlight the underlying philosophies and values of the national treatment principle in protecting the investors and addressing the host states’ regulatory needs. It reflects the contemporaneous development in international investment law and provides a positive response to public administrative principles benefited by way of international comparative administration law.
机译:投资条约中国民待遇规定的最低限度规定为法庭的解释提供了有限的指导。结果,在国民​​待遇的解释上存在矛盾,特别是在相似性问题上。本文旨在通过理论基础,历史沿革和相关投资决策来发展对适当比较者确定的理论理解。本文采用的方法是国际投资法和比较法学的理论和比较研究。本论文的主要部分致力于检验GATT / WTO,欧盟和国际人权法在解释基于国籍的歧视方面的比较和相关性。审查了各个判例在确定相似性和合法监管措施的相关问题时采用的解释方法,以了解在解释投资法中的国民待遇方面是否可以吸取教训。本论文的发现证实,比较中的法理学可能会提供一系列有见地的指导,从而可以对国际投资法中的国民待遇提供结构化的理解。提出的意见强调了国民待遇原则在保护投资者和满足东道国监管要求方面的基本理念和价值观。它反映了国际投资法的同期发展,并对通过国际比较行政法受益的公共行政原则做出了积极的回应。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mohamad Ali Norfadhilah;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号