首页> 外文会议>International astronautical congress >THE U.S. SPACE ACT OF 2015 AND THE PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW: FROM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS TO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN SPACE: A NATIONAL LEGAL APPROACH OF AN INTERNATIONAL AFFAIR
【24h】

THE U.S. SPACE ACT OF 2015 AND THE PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW: FROM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS TO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN SPACE: A NATIONAL LEGAL APPROACH OF AN INTERNATIONAL AFFAIR

机译:2015年美国空间法和国际私法:从知识产权到空间产权:国际事务的国家法律方法

获取原文

摘要

Thinking outer space, legally, is a duty. Everyone has to make a contribution in order to help develop this field of law. The Outer Space Treaty (OST) of 1967, that survived almost half a century, has formed more than ever an obstacle to the technologically more advanced countries -involved in space activities- in regard to outer space, as industry grows year after year. On the one hand, the international law has to be respected and, on the other hand, it is time for the private sector to get involved in the outer space activities. The OST of 1967 is far from being up-to-date and, modernizing it, is necessary. Otherwise, every country would have to establish its own legal framework and protect its investments; the United States being the first to do so. On the 25th of November 2015, President Barack Obama signed the U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act (US CSLCA) into law, giving right to American citizens to own and exploit outer space natural resources. This Act gives privilege to American citizens to take advantage from these huge space resources. In order to understand this American significant initiative, legal explanation can be proposed. Therefore, it is helpful to compare the outer space's issue to a domestic one. It is difficult to compare outer space to a public property (unless we adopt Georges Scelle's theory of the 'domaine public international'), given that a public property belongs to the State. In other words, it belongs to one party, the State. But in this case, outer space belongs to all States thus, to different parties. For this reason, considering outer space as common property, where every State forms a co-owner, is fundamental. The question here is whether the US has the authority to give right to its citizens to exploit outer space natural resources or not. In other words, do the private property rights in outer space contravene the fundamental principles of the international law? This paper does not establish a mechanism for the distribution of interests as a result of a private investment in outer space. This paper seeks to analyze the relationship between the different actors in outer space, in case of a private investment: on the one hand, the relationship between the State and the international community and on the other hand, the relationship between the private sector and the State.
机译:从法律上考虑外层空间是一种责任。每个人都必须做出贡献,以帮助发展这一法律领域。 1967年的《外层空间条约》(OST)生存了将近半个世纪,随着工业年年增长,它比以往任何时候对涉及外层空间的技术更先进的国家(涉及太空活动)构成了更大的障碍。一方面,必须遵守国际法,另一方面,现在是私营部门参与外层空间活动的时候了。 1967年的OST远远不是最新的,并且有必要对其进行现代化。否则,每个国家都必须建立自己的法律框架并保护其投资;美国是第一个这样做的国家。 2015年11月25日,美国总统巴拉克·奥巴马(Barack Obama)签署了《美国商业太空发射竞争力法》(US CSLCA),使美国公民拥有并开发外层空间自然资源的权利得到了法律批准。该法案赋予美国公民利用这些巨大空间资源的特权。为了理解美国的这一重大举措,可以提出法律解释。因此,将外层空间问题与国内问题进行比较是有帮助的。考虑到公共财产属于国家,很难将外层空间与公共财产进行比较(除非我们采用乔治·斯凯尔的“国际公共领域”理论)。换句话说,它属于一个政党,即国家。但是在这种情况下,外层空间因此属于所有国家,属于不同当事方。因此,将外层空间视为每个国家共同拥有财产的共同财产是至关重要的。这里的问题是,美国是否有权授予其公民开发外层空间自然资源的权利。换句话说,外层空间的私有财产权是否违反了国际法的基本原则?本文没有建立私人投资外层空间所产生的利益分配机制。本文旨在分析在私人投资情况下外层空间中不同行为者之间的关系:一方面,国家与国际社会之间的关系,另一方面,私人部门与国际社会之间的关系。状态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号