首页> 外文OA文献 >Identification of complex septic odorants in Huangpu River source water by combining the data from gas chromatography-olfactometry and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography using retention indices
【2h】

Identification of complex septic odorants in Huangpu River source water by combining the data from gas chromatography-olfactometry and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography using retention indices

机译:结合气相色谱-嗅觉法和综合二维气相色谱法,利用保留指数鉴定黄浦江源水中的复杂化臭剂

摘要

Identification of the trace odorants causing the septic odors in source waters with complex matrixes has long been a big challenge. The Huangpu (HP) River, an important source water for Shanghai, has long been suffering from septic and musty odors, although major odorants have not been identified. In this study, combining the data from gas chromatography-olfactometry with mass spectrometry (GC-O/MS) and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC x GC-TOFMS) using retention indices (RIs) was used for the identification of odorants in HP source water. Olfactometry peaks detected in water extracts by GC-O/MS were combined with the chromatography peaks detected by GC x GC-TOFMS based on the RIs determined using the retention times (RTs) of alkanes C7-C30. A total of thirteen olfactometry peaks were obtained though GC-O/MS analysis, and potential odorants corresponding to each of the olfactometry peaks were screened based on the odor characteristics and match similarity using GC x GC-TOFMS. Finally, fourteen odorants (one odorant was detected in GC x GC-TOFMS without an olfactometry peak), including three septic odorants (bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether, diethyl disulfide and dimethyl disulfide) and two musty ones (geosmin and 2-MIB), were confirmed by using authentic standards. The septic and musty odorants in six source water samples taken over a period of six months were quantified. Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether, with an odor activity value (OAV) of 1.84-3.2, was found to be a major septic odorant in HP source water, followed by diethyl disulfide (OAV 1.56-1.96) and dimethyl disulfide (OAV 0.37-2.42), while geosmin (OAV 4.37-11.44) was the major musty odorant, followed by 2-MIB (OAV 1.13-1.89). This is the first comprehensive study focusing on the identification of odorants in a complex source water. The integrated approach used in this study could be applied for the identification of odorants in other complex source waters suffering similar odor problems. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:长期以来,鉴定具有复杂基质的源水中引起腐臭味的微量气味一直是一个很大的挑战。黄浦河是上海的重要水源,尽管尚未发现主要的臭味,但长期以来一直遭受化脓和霉味的困扰。在这项研究中,使用保留指数(RIs)将气相色谱-嗅觉法与质谱法(GC-O / MS)的数据以及全面的二维气相色谱与飞行时间质谱法(GC x GC-TOFMS)相结合用于鉴定HP来源水中的气味。根据使用烷烃C7-C30的保留时间(RT)确定的RI,将通过GC-O / MS在水提取物中检测到的嗅觉峰与通过GC x GC-TOFMS检测到的色谱峰结合起来。通过GC-O / MS分析获得了总共13个嗅觉峰,并使用GC x GC-TOFMS根据气味特征和匹配相似性筛选了与每个嗅觉峰相对应的潜在气味剂。最后,有十四种气味剂(在GC x GC-TOFMS中检测到一种气味剂,没有嗅觉峰),包括三种化脓性气味剂(双(2-氯异丙基)醚,二乙基二硫化物和二甲基二硫化物)和两种有霉味的气味物质(Geosmin和2-MIB) ),并使用真实的标准进行了确认。在六个月的时间内对六个来源的水样本中的腐臭和霉味进行了定量。已发现气味活性值(OAV)为1.84-3.2的双(2-氯异丙基)醚是HP来源水中的主要腐臭剂,其次是二乙基二硫化物(OAV 1.56-1.96)和二甲基二硫化物(OAV 0.37) -2.42),而土臭素(OAV 4.37-11.44)是主要的霉味气味,其次是2-MIB(OAV 1.13-1.89)。这是首次全面研究,致力于鉴定复杂水源水中的气味。本研究中使用的综合方法可用于鉴定遭受类似气味问题的其他复杂水源水中的气味。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号