首页> 外文OA文献 >?What about the box?? Some thoughts on the possibility of ?corruption prevention?, and of ?the disciplined and ethical subject?
【2h】

?What about the box?? Some thoughts on the possibility of ?corruption prevention?, and of ?the disciplined and ethical subject?

机译:那盒子呢?关于“预防腐败”的可能性以及“纪律和道德主题”的一些想法。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Accepting the call to treat the ?toolbox? and not the ?tools? as central to doing Foucauldian analysis (Paltrinieri, 2012), this paper draws on Foucault's characterisation of his project as ?a critical history of thought? (Florence, 1994) where ?thought is understood as the very form of action? (Foucault, 1987a). Therewith the paper seeks to develop an analysis of corruption and corruption prevention among elites (Neu et al, 2015) in two ways. First it adopts Foucault's analysis of ?illegalism? in Discipline and Punish (1977: 82ff), wherein corruption ceases to be a negative?the ?unlawful? counterposed to ?law? as positive?as law itself becomes destabilised, framed by different forms of illegalism: ?illegalisms of property? for the poor leading to imprisonment, ?illegalisms of rights? for the powerful which go unchallenged. It suggests that elite corruption now supplements its use of the latter illegalisms through recourse to expert discourses of ?hyper-legalism?, increasingly entailing a ?skilful accounting? (Neu et al, 2015). Second, Neu et al propose that corruption's prevention may be effected by a modern Foucauldian ?ethical and disciplined subject?. However Foucault's analysis of modern self-formation in The Birth of Biopolitics (2008: 219ff) suggests this may prove problematic. The Human Capitalist subject is there an ?abilities machine? and ?entrepreneur of one's self?. As ?abilities machine? it is ?disciplined?, forming itself within the ?truth games? of today's ?double disciplinarity?, sc. involving self-engagement with both disciplinary conduct and disciplinary expertise. As ?self-entrepreneur? it may also, formally, be ?ethical? (cf. Dilts, 2011), based on Foucault's own classification of the aspects of that relation (Foucault, 1987b). But substantively its ?ethicality? may entail ploys of hyper-legalism and skilful accounting, leading to corruption's continuance as well.
机译:接受呼叫以处理“工具箱”?而不是“工具”?作为进行福柯分析的核心(Paltrinieri,2012),本文借鉴了福柯对他的项目的描述作为“批判性的思想史”? (弗洛伦斯,1994年)哪里的思想被理解为行动的形式? (Foucault,1987a)。据此,本文试图以两种方式对精英阶层的腐败和腐败预防进行分析(Neu等,2015)。首先,它采用了福柯对“非法主义”的分析。在《纪律与惩罚》(Discipline and Punish,1977:82ff)中,其中腐败不再是消极的“非法”行为。与“法律”对立法律本身变得动荡不安,并受到不同形式的非法主义的包围:“财产非法主义”?对于导致监禁的穷人来说,“权利的非法行为”?对于无所不能的强大。它表明,精英腐败现在通过诉诸“超法律主义”的专家话语来补充其对后一种非法主义的使用,从而日益要求“熟练的会计”? (Neu等人,2015)。第二,诺伊等人提出预防腐败可以通过现代的福柯主义“道德和纪律性主体”来实现。然而,福柯对《生物政治学的诞生》(2008:219ff)中现代自我形成的分析表明,这可能是有问题的。人力资本主义主题有一个“能力机器”吗?和“一个自我的企业家”。作为“能力机器”?它是“有纪律的”,在“真理游戏”中形成自己?今天的“双重纪律”,sc。涉及具有纪律行为和纪律专业知识的自我参与。作为“自我企业家”?从形式上讲,它也可能是“道德的”吗? (cf. Dilts,2011),基于福柯自己对该关系各方面的分类(Foucault,1987b)。但是实质上是它的“道德性”吗?可能需要采取超法律主义和狡猾的会计手段,从而导致腐败现象继续存在。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hoskin K;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号