首页> 外文OA文献 >Guarantees of Non-Repetition and the Right to Health: Review of the Law and Evolving Practice of Judicial and Semi-Judicial Bodies at Global and Regional Levels
【2h】

Guarantees of Non-Repetition and the Right to Health: Review of the Law and Evolving Practice of Judicial and Semi-Judicial Bodies at Global and Regional Levels

机译:不重复和健康权的保障:全球和区域两级司法和半司法机构的法律和不断发展的实践的回顾

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this thesis is to analyse the concept of guarantees of non-repetition (GNR) in international law and to consider how to apply GNR in violations of the right to health. GNR are, together with compensation, restitution and satisfaction, forms of reparation. Although international tribunals and UN bodies have increasingly made use of this form of reparation, there is no clarity about both the legal status of the obligation to provide GNR, and the scope and reach of this obligation. Moreover, as economic, social and cultural rights (ESCR) are often targeted with the claim that their redress requires complex and expensive forms of reparation, there is a lack of clarity as to whether GNR are applicable to this type of rights and, if they are, how so. This thesis aims to make a twofold contribution to the literature. On the one hand it aims to unpack the elements of the duty of states to provide GNR in international law, whilst on the other, it aims to show a practical application of this form of remedy in a particular ESCR: the right to health. ududIt is argued in this thesis that the obligation to provide GNR has been increasingly recognised in public international law and international human rights law. This thesis will also argue that GNR are best granted in cases of large-scale, gross and serious violations of human rights and when there is a risk of repetition. ududIt will also argue that GNR are equally applicable to all civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights; and that there is nothing in either the nature or the concept of the right to health that prevents the application of GNR to the redress of violations to the this right.
机译:本文的目的是分析国际法中的不重复保证(GNR)的概念,并考虑如何在侵犯健康权的情况下适用GNR。 GNR与补偿,赔偿和满意一起构成赔偿形式。尽管国际法庭和联合国机构越来越多地使用这种赔偿形式​​,但对于提供GNR义务的法律地位以及该义务的范围和范围均不清楚。此外,由于经济,社会,文化权利(ESCR)常常以要求其补救需要复杂而昂贵的赔偿形式为目标,因此,不清楚GNR是否适用于此类权利,以及是否适用是的,是这样。本文旨在为文学做出双重贡献。一方面,它旨在解开国家在国际法中提供国民生产总值的义务的要素,另一方面,它旨在展示这种救济形式在特定的ESCR中的实际应用:健康权。 ud ud本论文认为,提供国民总收入的义务已在国际公法和国际人权法中得到越来越多的认可。本文还将论证,在大规模,严重和严重侵犯人权的情况下以及存在重复的风险时,最好授予GNR。 ud ud它还会争辩说,GNR同样适用于所有公民,政治,经济,社会和文化权利;健康权的性质或概念都没有任何内容可以阻止将GNR应用于对这一权利的侵犯的补救。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号