首页> 外文学位 >John Calvin's contribution to the emergence of judicial review: Source of the judicial duty to disobey unconstitutional laws
【24h】

John Calvin's contribution to the emergence of judicial review: Source of the judicial duty to disobey unconstitutional laws

机译:约翰·加尔文(John Calvin)对司法审查的出现的贡献:违反违宪法律的司法义务的来源

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

For decades, legal historians have debated the historical origins of the judiciary's power to declare laws unconstitutional, a power that is known as judicial review. John Marshall is traditionally credited with having established judicial review in the 1803 case of Marbury v. Madison, but its prior origins remain unclear.;Scholars have not seriously considered the possibility that John Calvin's Institutes of the Christian Religion, the first edition of which was published in 1536, was a primary source of the emergence of judicial review. In the Institutes' concluding chapter, after emphasizing that private citizens have a duty to obey any ruler, however tyrannical, Calvin strenuously contends that government officials have a duty to disobey tyrannical rulers in order to protect the people from such injustice.;More than 275 years later, Chief Justice John Marshall, author of the Supreme Court's opinion in Marbury, cited no authoritative basis for the assertion of the power of judicial review. Careful historical investigation demonstrates, however, that Marshall drew upon an understanding of the judiciary's role developed by George Wythe, his former law professor at William and Mary. Wythe had proclaimed his views as a judge on Virginia's highest court in 1782 in the case commonly known as Commonwealth v. Caton. Wythe, in that case, drew upon the political theory of Englishman Lord Abingdon, who as a member of the House of Lords had opposed British treatment of the North American colonies during the Revolutionary period. Abingdon, it appears, acquired the principled basis for that opposition from Calvinist theorists during the years that Abingdon spent in Geneva as a young man. Abingdon also appears to have been shaped by the Calvinist political theorist Algernon Sidney, whose Discourses on Government were published posthumously in 1698.;All of these theorists, from Sidney and Abingdon to Wythe and Marshall, adhered to the principle that government officials have a duty to protect the people against tyranny. That principle that can be traced to their common heritage: John Calvin's theology of official disobedience.
机译:几十年来,法律历史学家一直在辩论司法机构宣布法律违宪的权力的历史渊源,这种权力被称为司法审查。传统上,约翰·马歇尔(John Marshall)在1803年的马伯里诉麦迪逊(Marbury v。Madison)案中建立了司法审查,但其先前渊源尚不清楚。 1536年出版,是司法审查出现的主要来源。在研究所的最后一章中,加尔文强调私人公民有义务服从任何统治者,无论他们多么专横,但他坚决主张政府官员有义务违抗专制统治者,以保护人民免遭这种不公正待遇。275数年后,最高法院首席法官约翰·马歇尔(John Marshall)在马布里(Marbury)发表了意见,没有为主张司法复审权提供任何权威依据。然而,仔细的历史调查表明,马歇尔借鉴了乔治·怀斯(George Wythe)的前任威廉·玛丽法律教授对司法机关的作用的理解。威斯于1782年在弗吉尼亚州最高法院宣布了他作为法官的观点,此案通常被称为“联邦诉加顿案”。在那种情况下,威斯借鉴了英国人阿宾登(Lord Abingdon)的政治理论,他是英国上议院的成员,在革命时期反对英国对待北美殖民地。在阿宾登年轻时在日内瓦度过的那几年,看来阿宾登获得了加尔文主义理论家反对的原则基础。 Abingdon似乎也受到加尔文主义政治理论家Algernon Sidney的影响,他的政府论点于1698年死后出版。所有这些理论家,从Sidney和Abingdon到Wythe和Marshall,都遵循政府官员应尽职责的原则。保护人民免受暴政。可以追溯到他们共同遗产的这一原则:约翰·加尔文(John Calvin)的官方抗命神学。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ball, David T.;

  • 作者单位

    Graduate Theological Union.;

  • 授予单位 Graduate Theological Union.;
  • 学科 Theology.;Law.;Political science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 299 p.
  • 总页数 299
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号