首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluation of turbulence models in the PARC code for transonic diffuser flows
【2h】

Evaluation of turbulence models in the PARC code for transonic diffuser flows

机译:跨声速扩散器流的PARC代码中的湍流模型评估

摘要

Flows through a transonic diffuser were investigated with the PARC code using five turbulence models to determine the effects of turbulence model selection on flow prediction. Three of the turbulence models were algebraic models: Thomas (the standard algebraic turbulence model in PARC), Baldwin-Lomax, and Modified Mixing Length-Thomas (MMLT). The other two models were the low Reynolds number k-epsilon models of Chien and Speziale. Three diffuser flows, referred to as the no-shock, weak-shock, and strong-shock cases, were calculated with each model to conduct the evaluation. Pressure distributions, velocity profiles, locations of shocks, and maximum Mach numbers in the duct were the flow quantities compared. Overall, the Chien k-epsilon model was the most accurate of the five models when considering results obtained for all three cases. However, the MMLT model provided solutions as accurate as the Chien model for the no-shock and the weak-shock cases, at a substantially lower computational cost (measured in CPU time required to obtain converged solutions). The strong shock flow, which included a region of shock-induced flow separation, was only predicted well by the two k-epsilon models.
机译:通过使用5个湍流模型的PARC代码研究了跨音速扩散器的流量,以确定湍流模型选择对流量预测的影响。三种湍流模型是代数模型:Thomas(PARC中的标准代数湍流模型),Baldwin-Lomax和改进的混合长度-托马斯(MMLT)。其他两个模型是Chien和Speziale的低雷诺数k-ε模型。每个模型计算了三种扩散器流量,分别称为无冲击,弱冲击和强冲击情况,以进行评估。比较管道中的压力分布,速度分布,冲击位置和管道中的最大马赫数。总体而言,考虑到所有三个案例的结果,Chienk-ε模型是五个模型中最准确的模型。但是,MMLT模型以低得多的计算成本(以获得融合解决方案所需的CPU时间来衡量),为无冲击和弱冲击情况提供了与Chien模型一样精确的解决方案。仅通过两个kε模型才能很好地预测包括激波引起的流分离区域在内的强激波流。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号