[Abstract]: A ‘best practice’ design guideline for a bioretention basin is concluded by comparing and critically evaluating existing design guidelines, along with studies on their performance. Further, an appropriate naming convention for a bioretention basin is sought and concluded.udBioretention basins (which are an aspect of Water Sensitive Urban Design) seek to maintain near-to natural flow levels at storm water receiving waters (by retention of storm runoff) and treat storm runoff to remove pollutants at-source in urbanised areas.ududThis minimises the consequences on receiving waterways caused by urbanisation. The increase in impervious area in an urbanised area causes disruption to the natural hydrologic cycle and an increase in stormwater pollutant load.ududMany different guidelines exist for bioretention basin design due to simultaneous evolution of the technology in various locations around the world. A consensus on ‘bestudpractice’ design principles is needed.ududThe design guidelines of bioretention basins are easily divided into separate design elements. This enables comparison and critical evaluation to be undertaken in terms of each design element to conclude an overall ‘best practice’ design guideline for the system. Recommendations for further research into some of these design elements areudpresented due to conflicting information in the publications reviewed or a lack of information. Twelve design guidelines and twelve studies from the USA and Australia are used as a source of information.ududThe naming convention is also compared in the various publications reviewed and other literature. The most appropriate term for a bioretention basin is ‘bioretention’ followed by either ‘basin’, ‘system’, ‘cell’, ‘area’ or ‘facility’.ududA ‘best practice’ design guideline has been concluded. It shares many similarities to some of the existing design guidelines, giving it some merit. Field testing is recommended to research its effectiveness.
展开▼
机译:[摘要]:通过对现有设计指南进行比较和严格评估,并对其性能进行研究,得出了生物保留池的“最佳实践”设计指南。此外,寻求并总结了适用于生物滞留池的命名约定。 ud生物滞留池(这是“水敏感城市设计”的一个方面)寻求通过接收雨水径流来保持接收雨水的水位接近自然流量。并处理暴雨径流以去除城市化地区的源头污染物。 ud ud将城市化对接收水道的影响降到最低。城市化地区不透水面积的增加导致自然水文循环的中断,雨水污染物负荷增加。 ud ud由于生物技术在世界各地的同步发展,生物保留池设计存在许多不同的准则。需要就“最佳最佳实践”设计原则达成共识。 ud ud生物滞留池的设计准则很容易分为不同的设计元素。这样就可以对每个设计元素进行比较和严格评估,从而得出系统的总体“最佳实践”设计指南。由于所审查出版物中的信息矛盾或缺乏信息,因此提出了对其中一些设计元素进行进一步研究的建议。来自美国和澳大利亚的十二个设计指南和十二项研究被用作信息来源。生物保留池最合适的术语是“生物保留”,然后是“盆地”,“系统”,“单元”,“区域”或“设施”。 ud ud“最佳实践”设计指南已经完成。它与某些现有设计准则具有许多相似之处,因此具有一定的优点。建议进行现场测试以研究其有效性。
展开▼