首页> 外文OA文献 >Psychological and contextual influences on travel mode choice for commuting
【2h】

Psychological and contextual influences on travel mode choice for commuting

机译:心理和情境对通勤出行方式选择的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Travel behaviour - especially car use - is of concern because it contributes toudenvironmental problems such as climate change. Focusing on commuting, this thesisudaimed to explain people's travel mode decisions and what might motivate drivers toudswitch modes. The literature shows that - as in the wider field of environmentallysignificantudbehaviour - Schwartz's norm-activation theory (NAT) and Ajzen's theory ofudplanned behaviour (TPB) are predominant in travel psychology. Research undertakenudfor this thesis was based on these theories.udStudy 1 used logistic regression (n = 312) to test NAT and the TPB's ability toudexplain drivers' intentions to maintain or reduce their car use for commuting to DeudMontfort University (DMU). A model using variables from both theories was also tested,udas was a model that added contextual variables to these psychological constructs. Theudmodel including contextual variables had the greatest predictive power (shown by Rludvalues). There were interactions between several predictor variables. Most notably, theudinfluence of altruistic (pro-environmental) motives on intentions was moderated byudperceived control over commuting mode choice and by contextual factors includingudbicycle ownership, carriage of passengers and journey time.udIn study 2,24 semi-structured interviews were undertaken with commuters to DMU.udUsing discourse analytic techniques, the prevalent stances on car use and use of otherudmodes for travel to work were identified. Many echoed NAT and TPB constructs (e.g.udmoral motives, perceived control over modal choice), underlining these theories'udapplicability to commuting. However, other stances were also evident, most notablyudaffective motives and habits as reasons for commuting mode decisions. People drewudon various combinations of these discourses to explain their commuting behaviour.udThe thesis proposes a new model of commuting mode choice and suggests guidelinesudfor interventions designed to encourage drivers to use alternative modes. However, it isudstressed that reliance on attitude-behaviour research alone may ignore wider socioculturaludinfluences on travel behaviour. Suggestions are made regarding theoreticaludperspectives and methods that may help in understanding these forces and a case isudmade for mixed-method research as the way ahead for travel psychology.
机译:出行行为-尤其是汽车使用-令人担忧,因为它会导致环境问题,例如气候变化。本文着重于通勤,旨在解释人们的出行方式决定以及可能促使驾驶员选择出行方式的因素。文献表明-与广泛的具有环境意义的行为类似,施瓦兹的规范激活理论(NAT)和阿杰森的计划外行为理论(TPB)在旅行心理学中也很占主导地位。本论文的研究基于这些理论。 udStudy 1使用logistic回归(n = 312)来测试NAT和TPB的能力,以 udexplain驾驶员意图维持或减少乘车前往De udMontfort University的意图。 (DMU)。还测试了使用来自两种理论的变量的模型, udas模型为这些心理构造添加了上下文变量。包括上下文变量的 udmodel具有最大的预测能力(由Rl udvalues显示)。几个预测变量之间存在相互作用。最明显的是,对通勤方式选择的无意识控制和对包括 udbicycle所有权,乘客运输和出行时间在内的背景因素的控制,已经削弱了利他(亲环境)动机对意图的影响。 ud在研究2,24中,使用话语分析技术,确定了汽车使用和其他上班方式的普遍使用立场。许多相呼应的NAT和TPB构造(例如 udmoral动机,对模态选择的感知控制),突显了这些理论对通勤的适用性。但是,其他立场也很明显,其中最明显的动机/习惯是通勤模式决定的原因。人们利用这些话语的各种组合来解释他们的通勤行为。 ud本文提出了一种新的通勤方式选择模型,并提出了旨在鼓励驾驶员使用替代方式的干预措施指南。然而,强调仅依靠态度行为研究可能会忽略更广泛的社会文化对旅行行为的影响。就可能有助于理解这些作用力的理论,观点和方法提出了建议,并提出了混合方法研究的案例,以此作为旅行心理学的前进方向。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wall Rob;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号