首页> 外文OA文献 >Mikrobiologische Sicherheit und Sensorik von zwei Rindfleisch-Reifesystemen unter handwerklichen Produktionsbedingungen
【2h】

Mikrobiologische Sicherheit und Sensorik von zwei Rindfleisch-Reifesystemen unter handwerklichen Produktionsbedingungen

机译:手工生产条件下两个牛肉成熟系统的微生物安全性和传感器

摘要

Microbial status, and organoleptic properties of matured beef are relevant quality parameters. Alternative maturation methods with low microbial risk over a longer ageing period are of interest. For this work, three Highland Cattles from organic husbandry were slaughtered in an external slaughterhouse. Cooled cattle halves were transported to a butcher in another location. Boned beef was packed in two different maturation systems: (i) vacuum maturation in sealed plastic bags („bag“), and (ii) maturation in a maturation box („box“). Samples were taken after 15, 21, 28 and 34 days. Microbial test results were assessed according to DGHM guidelines. Recommend level for total germ counts were exceeded in six samples from the maturation in „bag“, and in four from the „box“. Regarding Enterobacteriaceae, critical level was achieved in six samples („bag“), resp. four („box“). Staphylococcae were found in both systems, no Salmonellae were found. In addition, samples were analysed by use of spectroscopy, to obtain data for the development of rapid detection methods. Organoleptic tests were conducted on samples but non-processed beef (except short-roasing for testing the taste) according to a DLG scheme. The average overall scores show little differences: bag 4,47, and box 4,29. As well, no clear trend for any criterion in function of time was found. The results suggest the microbial and organoleptic suitability of both maturation systems in decentralised small-scale beef production systems, if hygienic practice is observed. It is intended to exceed these maturation tests for a period of about 60 days.
机译:成熟牛肉的微生物状态和感官特性是相关的质量参数。在较长的老化期内具有较低微生物风险的替代成熟方法受到关注。为了这项工作,在外部屠宰场屠宰了三头有机牧业的高地牛。将冷却的牛一半转移到另一个地点的屠夫。腌制的牛肉用两种不同的成熟系统包装:(i)在密封的塑料袋(“ bag”)中进行真空成熟,以及(ii)在成熟盒(“ box”)中成熟。在15、21、28和34天后取样。微生物测试结果根据DGHM指南进行评估。在“袋子”中成熟的六个样本中和“盒子”中四个成熟的样本中的总细菌数均超过了推荐水平。关于肠杆菌科,分别在六个样品(“袋”)中达到了临界水平。四个(“盒子”)。在两个系统中均发现葡萄球菌,未发现沙门氏菌。另外,通过使用光谱学分析样品,以获得用于快速检测方法发展的数据。根据DLG方案对样品进行了感官测试,但未经加工的牛肉(用于测试口味的短松软牛肉除外)进行了测试。平均总得分差异不大:袋4,47和盒4,29。同样,没有发现任何关于时间函数的明确趋势。结果表明,如果遵守卫生规范,则在分散的小规模牛肉生产系统中,两种成熟系统在微生物和感官上的适用性。打算超过这些成熟测试大约60天。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号