首页> 外文OA文献 >Water remunicipalisation: Between pendulum swings and paradigm advocacy
【2h】

Water remunicipalisation: Between pendulum swings and paradigm advocacy

机译:水补偿:在摆式摆动与范式倡导之间

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This chapter considers whether remunicipalisation – the return of water services to public ownership and management following the termination of private operating contracts – has a role to play in the future of the urban water sector. It does so by looking at the process of remunicipalisation in Berlin, Germany and Buenos Aires, Argentina. Attention is paid to the interplay of: 1) pendulum swings between competing paradigms of water service management; 2) the paradigm advocacy resulting in the dominance and emergence of paradigms at local level; and, 3) the conceptual tensions between communitarian and privatist paradigms of urban water management. ududIn both cases, the rigidity of the privatist paradigm has led to the emergence of the communitarian paradigm. Two different processes of remunicipalisation are observed: explicit paradigm advocacy in Berlin, and tacit paradigm advocacy in Buenos Aires. In neither case has the passage from private to public ownership automatically led to the dominance of the communitarian paradigm. Indeed, the causal relationship between remunicipalisation and progressive change is not one of necessity but rather of possibility. Nonetheless, the emergence of water remunicipalisation as a global trend in the last 15 years has profoundly reconfigured institutional trajectories in the urban water sector. The dominance of the privatist paradigm is now challenged in the global North and South and will continue to be in future. This is due to persistent demands by communities for water to be treated as a social good, and the shortcomings of water privatisation as a community development tool.
机译:本章考虑了市政化(即私人运营合同终止后将水服务归还公有制和管理权)是否在城市水务部门的未来中发挥作用。它是通过考察德国柏林和阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯的政府化进程来实现的。注意以下方面的相互作用:1)供水服务管理竞争范式之间的摆动。 2)范式的倡导导致范式在地方一级的统治和出现; 3)城市水管理的社区主义和私有主义范式之间的概念张力。在这两种情况下,私人主义范式的僵化都导致了共产主义范式的出现。观察到了两种不同的重新分配过程:柏林的显式范式倡导和布宜诺斯艾利斯的隐性范式倡导。在这两种情况下,从私有制到公有制的转变都不会自动导致社群主义范式的统治。确实,重新分配与渐进式变革之间的因果关系不是必要条件之一,而是可能性。尽管如此,在过去的15年中,水补偿的全球趋势的出现深刻地改变了城市水务部门的机构发展轨迹。如今,在全球北方和南方,私有主义范式的统治地位受到挑战,并将在未来继续存在。这是由于社区不断要求将水视为一种社会福利,以及水私有化作为社区发展工具的缺点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lobina Emanuele;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 100
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号