首页> 外文OA文献 >Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act 1970 and Labour Market Flexibility: An Exploratory Assessment of Contract Labour use in India?s Formal Manufacturing
【2h】

Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act 1970 and Labour Market Flexibility: An Exploratory Assessment of Contract Labour use in India?s Formal Manufacturing

机译:1970年合同工(管制和废除)法和劳动力市场灵活性:印度正式制造业中对合同工使用的探索性评估

摘要

One particularly significant piece of labour legislation in India is the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 (CLA,1970), which regulates labour hired by firms through the offices of a labour contractor - such labour being referred to as ?contract? labour in India. This paper seeks to examine this Act and its implication for manufacturing employment in India. While empirical evidence seems to indicate the presence of large number of ?contract? workers in the Indian manufacturing sector across a spectrum of industries, this increasing contractualisation of the workforce has not been typically discussed as a pointed labour regulation issue. It has been widely argued that Indian labour law imposes institutional rigidities inhibiting employment expansion; but note needs to be taken of a ruling by the Supreme Court in 2001 which interpreted the CLA, 1970 in the case of Steel Authority of India v. National Union Water-Front Workers.This judicial interpretation has led to increased flexibility in the Indian labour market enabling firms to employ ?contract? workers widely, often employing them in jobs where they work alongside permanent workers. Against this backdrop, we undertake a preliminary empirical exercise in an attempt to document the increase in engagement of ?contract? workers and to dissect the data to see patterns in the use of ?contract? workers in formal manufacturing. These empirical patterns help us generate hypotheses for further work on the normative consequences of large scale use of ?contract? labour ? the use of ?contract? workers no doubt brings in flexibility in labour usage and can be judged as a beneficial development for employers, however issues of investment in skills remains a hindrance in enhancing labour as well as overall welfare.
机译:印度的一项特别重要的劳动立法是《 1970年合同劳工(管理和废除)法》(CLA,1970年),该法对公司通过劳工承包商办公室雇用的劳工进行了规范,这种劳工被称为“合同”。在印度劳动。本文旨在研究该法案及其对印度制造业就业的影响。虽然经验证据似乎表明存在大量的“合同”?在印度各行各业的制造业中,这种日益增加的劳动力合同化没有被作为尖锐的劳动法规问题进行讨论。广泛争论的是,印度的劳动法强加了体制僵化,抑制了就业的扩大。但是需要注意的是最高法院在2001年作出的一项裁决,该裁决在印度钢铁管理局诉国家联盟水边工人一案中解释了1970年的CLA。这种司法解释提高了印度劳工的灵活性市场使公司能够雇用“合同”?工人,经常雇用他们从事与长期工人一起工作的工作。在此背景下,我们进行了初步的实证研究,以试图证明“合同”参与度的增加。工人和解剖数据以查看使用“合同”的模式正式制造业的工人。这些经验模式有助于我们为大规模使用“合同”的规范性后果作进一步的假设。劳工 ?合同的使用毫无疑问,工人带来了灵活性的劳动使用,可以被认为是对雇主有利的发展,但是技能投资问题仍然是增加劳动力和整体福利的障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号