首页> 外文OA文献 >Spatial Configurations: Complex Systems Experiment of Design Automation
【2h】

Spatial Configurations: Complex Systems Experiment of Design Automation

机译:空间配置:设计自动化的复杂系统实验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The study of design does not seem to shift from the paradigm that design process is a complex and seems similar to the nature of a black box system. It is a process which can be viewed solely in terms of its input and output, without a detail prescription of the process to produce that output. The complex nature of design process, and architecture design in particular have been explained by experts (Alexander 1964, Anderson 1966 to name a few), but this thesis underlines the work around of the rigid clear box system of computing to get a reliably working non-wired-in process to support the notion of architecture design as a complex system.udThe clear box nature of computing process is a fundamental characteristic of computing, so the process to be proposed has to work within this framework. The process would have to be prescribed or otherwise it cannot be executed. Many machines which given the same input and the same process, will all result in the same output. A single machine which given the same input and the same process to execute for many times will all result in the same output each time. However, the development of computing has enabled the processing of multiple inputs. The significant of parallel computing is that it seems to provide a window of epistemic autonomy within a process.udThere is a large philosophical and theoretical discussion behind the notion of epistemic autonomy which this thesis tried to introduce a preliminary summary, and sums it into the following description. A system consists of one single bird and a process of how to fly may result in a bird flying. Given many birds and implementing flying process synchronously to all the birds could result in a swarm of birds. There is not much different to see one bird or many birds flying in the sky, except that in many birds that each are using the same flying process would result in an underlying flying configurations. The underlying flying configuration is not part of the system; it is an emergence of the system. So the emergence structure of flying bird was enabled by a window of epistemic autonomy which comes from the use of many flying birds as opposed to a single flying bird.udA window of epistemic autonomy seems to have been created in the programming experiments with the implementation of a basic Agent-Based Model (ABM) as ABM is inherently an autonomous non-wired in process (Cilliers, 1993). The coding is based on a system introduce by Reynolds (1987) which a program was already built and modified many times in projects within CECA – UEL. To put simply, the inputs are multiple copies of one type of entity placed in using randomizing code, and the process synchronously applied to all these copies are to move towards the closest out of other three neighboring entities.udThe utilization of ABM into the programming experiment seems parallel with the findings in the literature review where it proposes a summary of a production of space by way of using a binary approach known to be brought up by Lefebvre (1974). Lefebvre seems to suggest that the very basis of spatial production is that space consists of either a moving or a non-moving social entity. Thus the criteria above since then been adapted to accommodate a simple social relations and this is called Social Preference Matrix (SPM). SPM is an original contribution in the form of coding that comes out of this thesis’s programming experiment. To put simply, SPM enables the identification of heading towards the nearest out of three neighboring entities only when it is the specific entity it relates to in the SPM. When this is triggered, both entities i.e. the one moving towards to and the designated entity both will eventually within a specific constant distance with each other, and these will stay in a loop of attract and repel, which is perceived as simulation of these being stop moving.udThe development of the programming experiment have found that when all entities are identified as occupying entities, eventually all entities will loop in attract and repel, i.e. all eventually will be non-moving. When introduce with non-occupying entities, i.e. those not identified and included in the SPM, then the possibility to have similar characteristic to what is known in the Configurational Theory as the movement space appears.udThe specific of architectural production may be seen as an opposite of the dynamics seen in an underlying configuration of bird swarm. Architectural subjects particularly regarding spatial configurations seems to be required to be static; there is not known liquid or ever-changing spatial configurations. Thus instead merely producing a system of moving around entities in space, this then had to be translated into some static versions of events. In this programming experiment, these were built on the basis of notations provided by the Configurational Theory (Hillier, 1996). Interestingly, he also stated in his previous work (Hillier, 1978) that there is a production of space where a larger space is being divided into smaller space.udThere is a body of research into programming headed by Mitchell, et.al (1976), which stretches for about three decades afterwards. However as far as the literature investigation went, none has seemed to explore the notion of epistemic autonomy in the production of spatial configurations. Following this finding, the programming experiment then added in a program called Voronoi Diagram (version coded in the programming experiment is as prescribed by Akl and Lyons, 1993) which enables several significant developments in producing spatial configurations by way of dividing space.udFirstly, the production of space by way of dividing space is based on an emergence of underlying configuration out of possible social relations between entities occupying the space. Secondly, the division is based on maximum arrangement of occupiable space between all occupying and non occupying entities, because Voronoi Diagram divided space equally in between all of the identified entities. Thirdly; a part from an emergence spatial relations by way of utilization of SPM within the ABM, the employment of Voronoi Diagram also enables the emergence of shapes and dimensions out of the divided space.udAt the end of this study, the programming experiment has resulted in a programming framework named Spatial Languaging. A part from that there seems to be a promising field of research into programming under the notion of epistemic autonomy specifically develops for architectural systems, because there are numerous methods of parallel processing and many different media of implementing ABM. More importantly, the notion of structural emergence seems applicable to many aspects of architecture and all worth exploring.
机译:设计的研究似乎并没有脱离设计过程是复杂的范例,并且似乎与黑匣子系统的本质相似。该过程只能从其输入和输出方面进行查看,而无需详细说明产生该输出的过程。设计过程的复杂性,尤其是建筑设计已经由专家进行了解释(Alexander 1964,Anderson 1966仅举几例),但是本文强调了刚性透明盒计算系统的工作,以得到可靠的工作环境。连接过程支持体系结构设计作为复杂系统的概念。 ud计算过程的清晰特性是计算的基本特征,因此,要提出的过程必须在此框架内工作。必须规定该过程,否则将无法执行。许多具有相同输入和相同过程的机器都将产生相同的输出。一次输入相同且执行相同过程要执行多次的单个机器,每次都会产生相同的输出。但是,计算的发展使得能够处理多个输入。并行计算的重要意义在于,它似乎为一个过程中的认知自主提供了一个窗口。 ud在认知自主概念的背后有大量的哲学和理论讨论,本论文试图引入一个初步的总结,并将其概括为以下说明。系统由一只鸟组成,并且如何飞行的过程可能会导致鸟飞。给定许多鸟类,并且对所有鸟类同步实施飞行过程可能会导致成群的鸟类。看到一只鸟或多只鸟在天空中飞行没有太大区别,只是在许多鸟中,每只鸟都使用相同的飞行过程会导致潜在的飞行配置。基本的飞行配置不是系统的一部分;这是系统的出现。因此,飞鸟的出现结构是由认知自主窗口实现的,该窗口来自使用许多飞鸟而不是单个飞鸟。 ud在实现过程的编程实验中似乎已经建立了认知自主窗口基本的基于代理的模型(ABM),因为ABM本质上是一个过程中的自主非有线过程(Cilliers,1993)。编码基于Reynolds(1987)引入的系统,该程序已经在CECA – UEL的项目中构建并修改了许多次。简而言之,输入是使用随机化代码放置的一种类型实体的多个副本,并且同步应用于所有这些副本的过程将朝着其他三个相邻实体中最靠近的实体移动。 ud在编程中使用ABM实验似乎与文献综述中的发现相平行,该文献提出了一种利用莱菲布弗(Lefebvre(1974))提出的二元方法对空间产生进行总结的方法。勒费弗尔似乎暗示,空间生产的根本基础是空间由移动的或不移动的社会实体组成。因此,上述标准从那时起就被调整为适应简单的社会关系,这被称为社会偏好矩阵(SPM)。 SPM是本论文的编程实验中以编码形式做出的原始贡献。简而言之,SPM仅当它是SPM中与之相关的特定实体时,才能够识别朝着三个相邻实体中的最近实体的方向。触发此操作后,两个实体(即移向的实体和指定实体)最终都会彼此保持特定的恒定距离,并且它们将保持吸引和排斥的循环,这被视为对这些停止的模拟 ud编程实验的发展发现,当所有实体都被识别为占用实体时,最终所有实体都会循环吸引和排斥,即最终所有实体都将不移动。当引入非占用实体(即那些未标识并包含在SPM中的实体)时,就会出现与配置理论中已知的运动空间类似特征的可能性。 ud建筑生产的特定性可以被视为一种与鸟类群的基本结构中看到的动态相反。似乎特别需要关于空间配置的建筑主题是静态的。没有已知的液体或不断变化的空间配置。因此,取而代之的是只产生一个围绕空间中的实体移动的系统,然后必须将其转换为事件的某些静态版本。在此编程实验中,这些是基于配置理论提供的符号(Hillier,1996)构建的。有趣的是,他在以前的工作中也提到过(希利尔(1978年)时,有一个生产空间,即将一个较大的空间划分为多个较小的空间。 ud以Mitchell等人(1976)为首的编程研究已有三十年之久。然而,就文献调查而言,似乎没有人探索空间形态产生中的认知自主性概念。根据这一发现,然后将编程实验添加到名为Voronoi图的程序中(编程实验中编码的版本由Akl和Lyons规定,1993年),该程序可以通过划分空间来产生空间配置,从而实现了一些重要的发展。 ud首先,通过划分空间来生产空间的基础是潜在配置的出现,这些潜在配置来自占据空间的实体之间可能的社会关系。其次,该划分基于所有占用实体和非占用实体之间的最大可占用空间布置,因为Voronoi图在所有已标识实体之间均等地划分了空间。第三;通过利用ABM中SPM的出现空间关系,Voronoi图的使用还可以使形状和尺寸出现在分开的空间之外。 ud在本研究结束时,编程实验导致了一个名为“空间语言”的编程框架。一部分原因是,在认知自主性的概念下,似乎有一个充满希望的编程研究领域专门针对建筑系统而开发,因为存在许多并行处理方法以及实现ABM的许多不同媒介。更重要的是,结构出现的概念似乎适用于建筑的许多方面,所有方面都值得探索。

著录项

  • 作者

    Idarti Choesnah;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号