首页> 外文OA文献 >Wozu Umweltforschung? - Über das Spannungsverhältnis zwischen Forschungstraditionen und umweltpolitischen Leitbildern. Teil II: Zum Leitbild 'Reflexive Umweltforschung'ud
【2h】

Wozu Umweltforschung? - Über das Spannungsverhältnis zwischen Forschungstraditionen und umweltpolitischen Leitbildern. Teil II: Zum Leitbild 'Reflexive Umweltforschung'ud

机译:为什么要进行环境研究? -关于研究传统与环境政策之间的紧张关系。第二部分:“反身环境研究”的指导原则

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the treatment of environmental problems, there is often a discrepancy between the needs of planners and decision makers and the results provided by scientific research. This discrepancy is related to the different aims, priorities, and codes of practice of scientists, on the one hand, and decision- and policy-makers, on the other hand. To explore how this discrepancy could be reduced to some extent, we first introduce the distinction between knowledge-oriented and decision-oriented reduction of complexity. The challenge today's environmental research is faced with is that, to some extent, decision-oriented reduction of complexity should be incorporated in the selection and solution of scientific problems. This can be achieved by orientation towards societal guiding principles such as sustainability or the precautionary principle. Following this approach, we then introduce the guiding principle of “reflexive environmental research” and point out how it differs from the guiding principles of “classical scientific research”. Key elements of reflexive environmental research are: reflection of guiding ideas external to science (e.g. sustainability); addressing explicitly the uncertainty and openness of scientific results and forecasts; transdisciplinarity; the aim of contributing to the solution of complex and controversial real-world problems; adherence to relevant scientific standards. Finally, we discuss the way reflexive environmental research can contribute to scientific consulting in decision-making processes in both business and politics.ud
机译:在处理环境问题时,计划者和决策者的需求与科学研究提供的结果之间常常存在差异。这种差异一方面与科学家以及决策者和政策制定者的不同目标,重点和实践准则有关。为了探讨如何在某种程度上减少这种差异,我们首先介绍了知识减少和决策减少之间的区别。今天的环境研究面临的挑战是,在某种程度上,应将决策导向的复杂性降低纳入科学问题的选择和解决之中。这可以通过面向社会指导原则(例如可持续性或预防原则)来实现。然后,我们采用这种方法介绍“反身环境研究”的指导原则,并指出它与“古典科学研究”的指导原则有何不同。反身环境研究的关键要素是:反思科学以外的指导思想(例如可持续性);明确解决科学结果和预测的不确定性和开放性;跨学科性旨在为解决复杂和有争议的现实世界问题做出贡献;遵守相关的科学标准。最后,我们讨论了反思性环境研究如何有助于商业和政治决策过程中的科学咨询。 ud

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号