首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparing meta-analysis and ecological-longitudinal analysis in time-series studies: a case study of the effects of air pollution on mortality in three Spanish cities
【2h】

Comparing meta-analysis and ecological-longitudinal analysis in time-series studies: a case study of the effects of air pollution on mortality in three Spanish cities

机译:在时间序列研究中比较荟萃分析和生态纵向分析:以西班牙三个城市的空气污染对死亡率的影响为例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The objective of this paper is to introduce a diVerent approach, called the ecological-longitudinal, to carrying out pooled analysis in time series ecological studies. Because it gives a larger number of data points and, hence, increases the statistical power of the analysis, this approach, unlike conventional ones, allows the complementationof aspects such as accommodation of randomeffect models, of lags, of interaction between pollutants and between pollutantsand meteorological variables, that arehardly implemented in conventional approaches. Design—The approach is illustrated by providing quantitative estimates of the short-termeVects of air pollution on mortality in three Spanish cities, Barcelona,Valencia and Vigo, for the period 1992–1994. Because the dependent variable was a count, a Poisson generalised linear model was first specified. Several modelling issues are worth mentioning. Firstly, because the relations between mortality and explanatory variables were nonlinear, cubic splines were used for covariate control, leading to a generalisedadditive model, GAM. Secondly, the effectsof the predictors on the response were allowed to occur with some lag. Thirdly, the residual autocorrelation, because of imperfect control, was controlled for by means of an autoregressive PoissonGAM. Finally, the longitudinal designdemanded the consideration of the existenceof individual heterogeneity, requiringthe consideration of mixed models. Main results—The estimates of the relativerisks obtained from the individual analyses varied across cities, particularly those associated with sulphur dioxide. Thehighest relative risks corresponded toblack smoke in Valencia. These estimateswere higher than those obtained from theecological-longitudinal analysis. Relativerisks estimated from this latter analysiswere practically identical across cities,1.00638 (95% confidence intervals 1.0002,1.0011) for a black smoke increase of 10μg/m3 and 1.00415 (95% CI 1.0001, 1.0007)for a increase of 10 μg/m3 of sulphur dioxide. Because the statistical power is higher than in the individual analysis moreinteractions were statistically significant,especially those among air pollutants and meteorological variables.Conclusions—Air pollutant levels wererelated to mortality in the three cities ofthe study, Barcelona, Valencia and Vigo.These results were consistent with similarstudies in other cities, with other multicentric studies and coherent with both,previous individual, for each city, andmulticentric studies for all three cities
机译:本文的目的是介绍一种称为生态纵向的不同方法,以在时间序列生态研究中进行汇总分析。因为它提供了大量数据点,并因此增加了分析的统计能力,所以这种方法与常规方法不同,它可以对以下方面进行补充,例如适应随机效应模型,滞后,污染物之间以及污染物与气象之间的相互作用变量,这在常规方法中很难实现。设计—通过对西班牙三个城市巴塞罗那,巴伦西亚和维哥1992-1994年间的空气污染对死亡率的短期影响进行定量估计来说明该方法。由于因变量是一个计数,因此首先指定了Poisson广义线性模型。几个建模问题值得一提。首先,因为死亡率和解释变量之间的关系是非线性的,所以三次样条被用于协变量控制,从而导致了通用加性模型GAM。其次,允许预测变量对响应的影响发生一定的滞后。第三,由于控制不完善,残余自相关通过自回归PoissonGAM进行控制。最后,纵向设计要求考虑个体异质性的存在,需要考虑混合模型。主要结果-从各个分析中得出的相对风险的估计值在各个城市之间存在差异,尤其是与二氧化硫有关的风险。相对最高的风险对应于巴伦西亚的黑烟。这些估计高于从生态纵向分析获得的估计。从后者分析得出的相对风险在城市之间几乎相同,黑烟增加10μg/ m3时为1.00638(95%置信区间1.0002,1.0011),硫磺增加10μg/ m3时为1.00415(95%CI 1.0001,1.0007)。二氧化碳。由于统计能力高于个别分析,因此相互作用具有统计学意义,尤其是空气污染物和气象变量之间的相互作用。结论—研究的三个城市,巴塞罗那,巴伦西亚和维哥,空气污染物水平与死亡率相关。这些结果是一致的在其他城市有相似的研究,在其他多中心研究中又与两者相吻合,每个城市的先前个人,以及所有三个城市的多中心研究

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号