首页> 外文OA文献 >Are sliders too slick for surveys? An experiment comparing slider and radio button scales for smartphone, tablet and computer based surveys
【2h】

Are sliders too slick for surveys? An experiment comparing slider and radio button scales for smartphone, tablet and computer based surveys

机译:滑块是否太滑而不适合调查?一项比较滑块和单选按钮刻度以进行基于智能手机,平板电脑和计算机的调查的实验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

"The continued rise in smartphone penetration globally afford survey researchers with an unprecedented portal into personal survey data collection from respondents who could complete surveys from virtually any place at any time. While the basic research into optimizing the survey experience and data collection on mobile devices has continued to develop, there are still fundamental gaps in our knowledge of how to optimize certain types of questions in the mobile setting. In fact, survey researchers are still trying to understand which online design principles directly translate into presentation on mobile devices and which principles have to be modified to incorporate separate methods for these devices. One such area involves the use of input styles such as sliding scales that lend themselves to more touch centric input devices such as smartphones or tablets. Operationalizing these types of scales begs the question of an optimal starting position and whether these touch centric input styles are equally preferred by respondents using less touch capable devices. While an outside starting position seems optimal for slider questions completed via computer, this solution may not be optimal for completion via mobile devices as these devices are subjected to far more space and layout constraints compared to computers. This experiment moves the mixed device survey literature forward by directly comparing outcomes from respondents who completed a collection of survey scales using their smartphone, tablet or computer. Within each device, respondents were randomly assigned to complete one of 20 possible versions of scale items determined by a combination of three experimental factors including input style, length and number formatting. Results from this study suggest more weaknesses than strengths for using slider scales to collect survey data using mobile devices and also suggest that preference for these touch centric input styles varies across devices and may not be as high as the preference for the more traditional radio button style." (author's abstract)
机译:“全球智能手机普及率的持续上升为调查研究人员提供了前所未有的门户,使他们可以从几乎任何地方,随时随地完成调查的受访者那里收集个人调查数据。优化移动设备上的调查体验和数据收集的基础研究已经展开。持续发展,我们对如何在移动环境中优化某些类型的问题的认识仍然存在根本的差距,实际上,调查研究人员仍在尝试了解哪些在线设计原则直接转化为在移动设备上的呈现方式,哪些原则具有要进行修改以结合使用这些设备的单独方法,其中一个领域涉及使用输入样式(例如滑动秤),使其适合于更多以触摸为中心的输入设备(例如智能手机或平板电脑)。起始位置以及这些触摸中心输入是否使用触摸能力较低的设备的受访者同样喜欢使用“ yle”。虽然外部开始位置似乎对于通过计算机完成的滑块问题是最佳的,但此解决方案对于通过移动设备完成的问题可能不是最佳的,因为与计算机相比,这些设备要承受更多的空间和布局约束。该实验通过直接比较使用智能手机,平板电脑或计算机完成了一系列调查量表的受访者的结果,使混合设备调查文献向前发展。在每种设备中,被调查者被随机分配以完成20种可能的规模项目之一,该版本由三个实验因素(包括输入样式,长度和数字格式)共同决定。这项研究的结果表明,使用滑动标尺通过移动设备收集调查数据的缺点比优点更多,并且还表明,这些以触摸为中心的输入样式的偏好因设备而异,可能不如更传统的单选按钮样式高”(作者的摘要)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号