首页> 外文OA文献 >Cooperative purchasing in healthcare. Results of a survey study among purchasing professionals
【2h】

Cooperative purchasing in healthcare. Results of a survey study among purchasing professionals

机译:合作购买医疗保健。采购专业人员的调查研究结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Procurement is considered to be a promising area for lowering the costs in the health care sector. Estimates of savings on purchasing prices are 10 to 15% (Nollet & Beaulieu, 2005). In addition, there may be up to more than 40% cost savings on the administrative purchasing costs (Schneller, 2000). Cooperative purchasing is a relatively new strategy aimed at reducing costs in healthcare.Purchasing cooperation initiatives frequently fail. Previous studies have tried to explain the failures of purchasing groups. However, these studies report mixed findings and call for further research. Most studies on cooperative purchasing are qualitative and explorative by nature, which limits their generalizability. By contrast, the present study is set up as a quantitative research aimed at explaining the (lack of) success of cooperative purchasing in healthcare. The problem statement is: How can we explain the success of cooperative purchasing in healthcare?The literature review resulted in a theoretical framework that includes six hypotheses, mostly derived from Transaction Cost Economics (TCE). Trust, commitment, group formality, IT systems, communication, and teamwork skills were believed to have a significant impact on the success of cooperative purchasing. The framework includes another set of two hypotheses where a moderating effect of trust and commitment was expected on the relationship between group formality and success.E-mail invitations for a questionnaire were sent to 69 hospitals, active in cooperative purchasing, covering a total of 17 purchasing groups. A total of 88 valid responses were obtained for the statistical analysis, corresponding to an estimated effective response rate of 24%. Based on the results of a factor analysis, the Teamwork skills construct was divided in two sub-constructs: “teamwork skills-ideas” (relating to the capability of a team to form and execute plans and ideas) and “teamwork skills-conflict” (relating to the capability of a team to resolve conflicts). The results of a stepwise regression analysis indicated a significant impact of trust, IT systems, and teamwork skills-conflicts on the success of cooperative purchasing. Congruently with most previous studies, trust appears to be the most important factor explaining success. No former study explicitly researched the effect of IT systems on cooperative purchasing. The results of this study suggest the need for good and effective IT systems for the tactical purchasing process of cooperative purchasing. Apparently, conflict resolution is pivotal for managing a successful purchasing group. This part of teamwork skills was also not addressed before in literature on cooperative purchasing. In cooperative purchasing groups, there are many situations potentially leading to conflicts, such as, for example, the allocation of savings, time, and costs (Schotanus et al., 2010). Self-interest and opportunism will cause conflicts. Quick resolution of conflicts is found to be very important in the present study.The present study has some limitations that could be seen as a point of departure for further research. The sample size was relatively small and only perceptions have been measured. Further research could try to incorporate, for instance, financial data in their analysis. Our study suffered from a number of measurement problems limiting the generalizability and validity of the findings. Future research could try to work with more reliable constructs and attempt to find other explanatory variables and/or other (direct and moderating) effects.Finally, future studies within the healthcare sector could investigate other types of organizations beyond hospitals. It would be interesting to replicate the results of the present study in other parts of the public sector, the private sector, both in the Netherlands and abroad.
机译:采购被认为是降低卫生保健部门成本的有希望的领域。购买价格节省的费用估计为10%到15%(Nollet和Beaulieu,2005年)。此外,行政采购成本可节省多达40%以上的成本(Schneller,2000年)。合作购买是旨在降低医疗保健成本的相对较新的策略。购买合作计划经常失败。先前的研究试图解释购买群体的失败。但是,这些研究报告的结果参差不齐,需要进一步研究。大多数关于合作采购的研究本质上都是定性和探索性的,这限制了它们的推广性。相比之下,本研究是一项定量研究,旨在解释医疗保健领域合作购买的成功(缺乏)。问题陈述是:我们如何解释医疗保健中合作购买的成功?文献综述产生了一个理论框架,其中包括六个假设,这些假设主要来自交易成本经济学(TCE)。信任,承诺,团队正式性,IT系统,沟通和团队合作技能被认为对合作采购的成功有重大影响。该框架还包含两个假设,其中信任和承诺对团体形式与成功之间的关系会产生适度的影响。向69家积极合作购买医院的医院发出了电子邮件邀请问卷,共计17个采购组。统计分析共获得88个有效响应,相当于估计有效响应率为24%。根据因素分析的结果,团队合作技能结构分为两个子结构:“团队合作技能思想”(与团队形成和执行计划和构想的能力有关)和“团队合作技能冲突” (与团队解决冲突的能力有关)。逐步回归分析的结果表明信任,IT系统和团队合作技能冲突对合作购买的成功有重大影响。与大多数以前的研究一致,信任似乎是解释成功的最重要因素。以前没有研究明确研究过IT系统对合作购买的影响。这项研究的结果表明,在合作采购的战术采购过程中,需要良好而有效的IT系统。显然,解决冲突对于管理成功的采购团队至关重要。团队合作技能的这一部分也没有在关于合作购买的文献中讨论过。在合作采购小组中,有许多情况可能导致冲突,例如,储蓄,时间和成本的分配(Schotanus等,2010)。自我利益和机会主义将引起冲突。发现冲突的快速解决在本研究中非常重要。本研究有一些局限性,可以看作进一步研究的出发点。样本量相对较小,仅对知觉进行了测量。进一步的研究可以尝试将财务数据纳入其分析。我们的研究存在许多测量问题,这些问题限制了研究结果的推广性和有效性。未来的研究可能会尝试使用更可靠的结构,并试图找到其他解释变量和/或其他(直接和适度的)影响。最后,医疗保健领域的未来研究可能会调查医院以外的其他类型的组织。在荷兰国内外的公共部门的其他部分,私营部门中复制本研究的结果将是很有趣的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jonge de JH;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 nl
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号