首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparison of the influences of flotation and wet sieving on certain carbonized legume and cereal remains
【2h】

A comparison of the influences of flotation and wet sieving on certain carbonized legume and cereal remains

机译:比较浮选和湿筛对某些碳化豆类和谷物残留物的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In order to determine the influence of recovery techniques with water (flotation and wet sieving) on carbonized plant remains, a certain amount of wheat, barley, millet, horsebean and lentil macrofossils fromarchaeological sites was taken and treated with water. Moist recovery was also applied to in-laboratory, artificially, charred barley, millet and lentil samples. After the treatments, the investigated remains were re-counted and the percentages of still recognizable remains for every plant species and for each method were recorded. Comparisons were made of the sensitivities of the investigated species and of the differences in the degree of macrofossil breakup depending on the method of recovery. Our investigation proved that flotation is a less aggressive method than wet sieving and that barley, horsebean and wheat carbonized macrofossils are resistant to moist treatments, while the breakup percentage of lentil and millet (from archaeological sites) is higher than 30%, which should be taken into account when deciding on the (non)use of water recovery in the investigations.
机译:为了确定用水回收技术(浮选和湿筛)对碳化植物残体的影响,从考古现场采集了一定数量的小麦,大麦,小米,蚕豆和小扁豆化石,并用水进行了处理。湿法回收还应用于实验室,人工,焦化的大麦,小米和小扁豆样品。处理后,对被调查的残留物进行重新计数,并记录每种植物物种和每种方法仍可识别的残留物百分比。比较了所研究物种的敏感性以及根据回收方法而造成的大化石分解程度的差异。我们的研究证明,浮选是一种比湿筛分更具侵略性的方法,大麦,蚕豆和小麦的碳化大化石耐潮湿处理,而扁豆和小米(来自考古现场)的破碎率高于30%,应为在研究中决定(不)使用水回收时应考虑在内。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号