首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluation of Methods to Assess and Reduce Bacterial Contamination of Surface Water from Grazing Lands
【2h】

Evaluation of Methods to Assess and Reduce Bacterial Contamination of Surface Water from Grazing Lands

机译:评估和减少牧场地表水细菌污染的方法的评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Excessive bacterial levels are a major water quality concern. Better methods are needed to quantify the proportion of bacterial loading contributed by various sources, and best management practices are needed to restore water quality. This study assessed the ability of alternative water supplies and grazing management to reduce E. coli loading from cattle and evaluated the ability of quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis of total and bovine-associated Bacteroides markers (AllBac and BoBac, respectively) to determine the percentage of bovine-associated fecal contamination. Runoff from seven small watersheds, representing ungrazed, properly stocked, and overstocked conditions, was analyzed for E. coli, AllBac, and BoBac to assess grazing management impacts on E. coli runoff and the effectiveness of Bacteroides markers. To determine the effectiveness of alternative water, instream E. coli levels and cattle movement were evaluated before and after alternative water was provided. The study found that when alternative off-stream water was provided, the amount of time cattle spent in the creek was reduced 43 percent and the direct deposition of E. coli into Clear Fork of Plum Creek was estimated to be reduced from 1.11E 07 to 6.34E 06 colony forming units per animal unit per day. Observed pre- and post-treatment E. coli loads suggested similar reductions; however, this study could not conclusively attribute observed E. coli loading reductions to providing alternative water because of the lack of statistical significance of these observations, possibly due to decreased streamflow during Year 2 (due to drought) and a corresponding increase in E. coli levels. The study found that rotational stocking, if timed appropriately, was very effective at reducing E. coli runoff. The impact of grazing timing in relation to runoff events was more significant than the impact of grazing management (i.e. ungrazed properly stocked or overstocked) or stocking rate. When runoff occurred more than two weeks following grazing, E. coli levels in runoff were decreased more than 88 percent. Finally, data suggest that AllBac and BoBac markers are good indicators of recent fecal contamination from cattle. However, although elevated BoBac/AllBac ratios generally aligned well with cattle presence, this ratio appeared to underestimate the percentage of bovine-associated fecal contamination.
机译:细菌水平过高是主要的水质问题。需要更好的方法来量化各种来源造成的细菌负荷的比例,并且需要最佳管理方法来恢复水质。这项研究评估了替代供水和放牧管理的能力,以减少牛的大肠杆菌负荷,并评估了总和与牛相关的拟杆菌标记物(分别为AllBac和BoBac)的定量聚合酶链反应分析能力,以确定牛相关的粪便污染。分析了七个未集水区,适当放养和过度放养条件的小流域的径流中的大肠杆菌,AllBac和BoBac,以评估放牧管理对大肠杆菌径流的影响以及拟杆菌标记的有效性。为了确定替代水的有效性,在提供替代水之前和之后,评估了大肠杆菌的入流水平和牛的活动。研究发现,当提供替代的下游水时,牛在小河中花费的时间减少了43%,大肠杆菌在Plum Creek的Clear Fork中的直接沉积估计从1.11E 07减少到6.34E 06每个动物单位每天的菌落形成单位。观察到的治疗前后的大肠杆菌载量表明了类似的减少。但是,由于缺乏这些观测值的统计意义,该研究不能将观测到的大肠杆菌载量减少归因于提供替代水,这可能是由于第二年(由于干旱)第二季流量减少以及大肠杆菌相应增加所致。水平。研究发现,如果适当地安排轮作,对减少大肠杆菌径流非常有效。放牧时间相对于径流事件的影响要比放牧管理(即适当地放牧或未过度放牧的脱毛)或放养率的影响更为重要。当放牧后两周以上发生径流时,径流中的大肠杆菌水平降低了88%以上。最后,数据表明,AllBac和BoBac标记物是近期牛粪便污染的良好指标。然而,尽管升高的BoBac / AllBac比值通常与牛的存在良好吻合,但该比值似乎低估了牛相关粪便污染的百分比。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wagner Kevin;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号