首页> 外文OA文献 >Should we pay all smokers to quit smoking? A mixed methods survey exploring New Zealand smokers' perceptions of financial incentives
【2h】

Should we pay all smokers to quit smoking? A mixed methods survey exploring New Zealand smokers' perceptions of financial incentives

机译:我们应该支付所有吸烟者戒烟吗?一种混合方法调查,探索新西兰吸烟者对金融激励措施的看法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background Evidence suggests financial incentives can support smoking cessation among pregnant smokersand for employees in a workplace setting, yet low acceptability may limit the widerimplementation of such schemes. Theincreasing adoption of endgame goals by numerous countries indicates a need fornew and potentially controversial strategies that could bring about rapiddeclines in smoking prevalence. Limited research hasexamined how smokers themselves view the idea of financial incentive interventionsfor which the general population of smokers would be eligible.Methods A sample of 623 smokers was recruited from an internetpanel toa survey assessing support for, and perceived effectiveness of, financial incentivesfor smoking cessation. We used descriptive statistics, plus logistic regression,to test associations between demographics and smoking, and support. We used qualitative content analysis toanalyse open-ended responses to a question that invited respondents to commenton financial incentive schemes.Results Thirty-eight percent of smokers supported financialincentives to quit smoking; 42% did not. Support was higher among heavy (OR 3.96, CI2.39 - 6.58) and moderate smokers (OR 1.68, CI 1.13 - 2.49), and those with a recentquit attempt (OR 1.47, 1.04 - 2.07). Support was strongly associated with perceived effectiveness. Of those who did not oppose financialincentives: 45% preferred a Government-funded reward-only scheme, while 35% preferreda Government-funded deposit-based scheme; few respondents supportedemployer-funded schemes. Open-ended responses (n=301) indicated three overarchingthemes in relation to opposition to financial incentives: smokers' individualresponsibility for quitting, concerns about abuse of an incentive scheme, and concernsabout unfairness.Conclusions Financial incentive schemes designed to reward smokersfor quitting create controversy and attract low public support, despite growingevidence of their effectiveness. Mediaadvocacy and health education could be used to increase public understandingof, and support for, financial incentives for smoking cessation.
机译:背景技术证据表明,金融激励措施可以在工作场所环境中为员工提供孕妇的戒烟,但可接受性低的可接受性可能会限制此类方案的更宽。众多国家的最终目标采用了终止目标,表明需要有必要的争议和争议的争议策略,这些策略可以带来吸烟患病率的急流。有限的研究有限探讨了吸烟者自己如何看待占吸烟者普遍存在的财务激励干预措施的想法。方法从InternetPanel Toe调查评估和感知戒烟的互联网调查调查评估和感知有效性,招募了623名吸烟者的样本。我们使用描述性统计,加上逻辑回归,以测试人口统计和吸烟和支持之间的关联。我们使用定性内容分析与邀请受访者向注册经济奖励计划的问题进行定性内容分析。提出的三十八名吸烟者支持廉价戒烟; 42%没有。重型(或3.96,CI2.39 - 6.58)和中等吸烟者(或1.68,CI 1.13 - 2.49)的支持较高,以及最新的尝试(或1.47,1.04 - 2.07)。支持与感知有效性密切相关。那些没有反对金属事监会的人:45%首选政府资助的奖励计划,而35%的优惠政府资助的存款计划;少数受访者支持雇主资助的计划。开放式响应(n = 301)表示,与财务激励反对有关的三个总体题为:吸烟者的戒烟,令人担忧的是滥用激励计划的担忧,以及关注的不公平。结论金融激励计划,旨在奖励吸烟者戒烟和戒烟创造争议和尽管他们的有效性增长,但仍然吸引了低公共支持。 MaseAdvicace和Health教育可用于增加公众的理解,并支持戒烟的财务激励。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号