首页> 外文OA文献 >Failure pressure prediction of pipelines steel in the presence of corrosion defects and pre-strain
【2h】

Failure pressure prediction of pipelines steel in the presence of corrosion defects and pre-strain

机译:存在腐蚀缺陷和预应变的管道钢破坏压力预测

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This projects explains the methods used in predicting the failure pressure of defective pipelines. The failure pressure of defective was estimated for the pipe with the different types of defects. APIX42 steel is chosen for this studies and it must undergoes few machining steps to design a tensile test specimen according to ASTM E8-08M-11. Data obtained from tension test (engineering stress strain) must convert into true stress strain in order to transfer it during simulation (field). Power law is the formula used to convert engineering stress strain to true stress strain. Ultimate strength of APIX42 is predicted at 612 MPa. For modelling part, one quarter of pipeline geometry need to design in MSCPatran software. This study is only focussed on single type of defect. Meshing (element) steps continues after one quarter of geometry is designed. Modelling and simulation is repeated for the different depth (25%, 50% and 75%) of defects and increment in pre-strain. Result obtained after the simulation process must be interpolated to get more accurate failure pressure. Predicted failure pressure is higher for pipeline without presence of pre-strain. Pipeline with the presence of pre-strain, predicted failure pressure is reducing as the amount of pre-strain applied is increases. Three industry models are compared with the finite element result (FEA) for validation. For the lower depth, FEA failure prediction is the highest followed by DNV-RP-F101. ASME B31G and Modified B31G predicted almost same failure pressure but less than FEA and DNV-RPF101. When the depth increases, DVN-RP-F101 predicted higher value of burst pressure compared to FEA. Whereas Modified B31G and ASME B31G predicted lower failure pressure but getting closer to FEA and DVN-RP-F101. The same phenomena happened when various amount of pre-strain (1kN, 3kN and 5kN) applied, but predicted failure pressure is lower than without pre-strain. By referring to the result, presence of pre-strain is really effected value of failure pressure. Increase in pre-strain will cause losing balance strength in pipelines and leads failure in short time compare to pipelines without pre-strain.
机译:该项目说明了用于预测有缺陷的管道的失效压力的方法。对于具有不同类型缺陷的管道,估计缺陷的破坏压力。本研究选择了APIX42钢,并且根据ASTM E8-08M-11,它必须经过很少的加工步骤才能设计拉伸试样。从张力测试(工程应力应变)获得的数据必须转换为真实的应力应变,以便在模拟(现场)过程中进行传递。幂律是用于将工程应力应变转换为真实应力应变的公式。 APIX42的极限强度预计为612 MPa。对于建模部分,需要在MSCPatran软件中设计四分之一的管道几何形状。这项研究仅集中于单一类型的缺陷。在设计了四分之一的几何形状之后,继续进行网格划分(元素)步骤。对不同深度(25%,50%和75%)的缺陷和预应变的增量重复建模和仿真。必须对模拟过程之后获得的结果进行插值,以获得更准确的破坏压力。对于没有预应变的管道,预计的故障压力会更高。具有预应变的管道,随着施加的预应变量的增加,预计的破坏压力会降低。将三种行业模型与有限元结果(FEA)进行比较以进行验证。对于较低的深度,FEA故障预测最高,其次是DNV-RP-F101。 ASME B31G和改进的B31G预测几乎相同的失效压力,但小于FEA和DNV-RPF101。当深度增加时,与FEA相比,DVN-RP-F101预测的爆破压力值更高。修改后的B31G和ASME B31G预测了较低的失效压力,但越来越接近FEA和DVN-RP-F101。当施加不同数量的预应变(1kN,3kN和5kN)时,也会发生相同的现象,但是预测的破坏压力比没有预应变时要低。通过参考结果,预应变的存在实际上是破坏压力的影响值。与没有预应变的管道相比,预应变的增加将导致管道失去平衡强度,并在短时间内导致故障。

著录项

  • 作者

    Prakash Raj Subramaniam;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号