首页> 外文OA文献 >Analysis on the effect of different bracing types and layouts on lateral drift of 30-storey steel framed building subjected to lateral forces using ANSYS
【2h】

Analysis on the effect of different bracing types and layouts on lateral drift of 30-storey steel framed building subjected to lateral forces using ANSYS

机译:应用ANSYS分析不同支撑类型和布局对30层钢框架结构在侧向力作用下的侧向位移的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

High-rise steel construction is increasing at an expanding scale and in modern construction stiffness of the structure has become paramount criteria as the building increases in height. However, the aerial threat of wind forces had become a crucial factor to affect the building stiffness. Designers see great danger of this situation and it has led to introduction of bracing system that was often used to provide sufficient lateral stiffness to the structure. The main objective of this study is to determine the effect of different types and orientations of bracing on the frame structure in terms of lateral drift. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of ANSYS 12.0 software has been used to model 30-storey of 90 m height steel frame building subjected to substantial basic wind speed, or 3-second gust, of 24 meter per second, and wind load of 0.969 kPa. Four types of bracing: X-bracing, Inverted V-bracing, K-bracing and single-diagonal bracing were explored and 84 models of different configurations were run. Prior to limiting the lateral drift, the 84 models were again used to study the effect of changing from using pin connections to a combined pin-moment connections. All the beam and column used is made up of I-beam of structural steel grade S275 and of 3D Spar Link 8 element type. The X-bracing and Inverted V-bracing were relatively known as good in limiting lateral drift with regard to both types and configurations of bracing compared to K-bracing and single diagonal bracing. Meanwhile, changing from using pin connection to a combined pin-moment connections had reduced the lateral drift to about 26% to 48% depending on the type of bracing used.
机译:高层钢结构正在以不断扩大的规模增长,并且在现代建筑中,随着建筑物高度的增加,结构的刚度已成为最重要的标准。但是,风力的空中威胁已成为影响建筑物刚度的关键因素。设计师看到这种情况的巨大危险,并导致引入了支撑系统,该系统通常用于为结构提供足够的横向刚度。这项研究的主要目的是确定侧向支撑方面不同类型和方向的支撑对框架结构的影响。 ANSYS 12.0软件的有限元分析(FEA)已用于对高度为90 m的30层钢框架建筑进行建模,使其经受每秒24米的基本基本风速(3阵风)和0.969 kPa的风荷载。研究了四种类型的支撑:X支撑,倒V形支撑,K支撑和单对角支撑,并运行了84种不同配置的模型。在限制横向漂移之前,再次使用84个模型来研究从使用引脚连接变为组合的引脚-力矩连接的影响。所有使用的梁和柱都由结构钢S275和3D Spar Link 8元素类型的工字梁组成。相对于K型支撑和单个对角支撑,X型支撑和反向V型支撑在支撑类型和配置方面都可以很好地限制横向偏移。同时,根据使用的支撑类型,从使用引脚连接更改为组合的引脚力矩连接已将横向漂移降低到大约26%至48%。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dushendran Bala Krisnain;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号