首页> 外文OA文献 >Informed trading by foreign institutional investors as a constraint on tunneling: Evidence from China
【2h】

Informed trading by foreign institutional investors as a constraint on tunneling: Evidence from China

机译:外国机构投资者作为隧道制约的通报:来自中国的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Research Question/Issue: This paper investigates how the trading activities of foreign institutional investors (FIIs) affect the tunneling activities of controlling shareholders in an emerging economy (China).ududResearch Findings/Insights: We use an unbalanced panel dataset of 167 FIIs with investments in Chinese real estate firms during the period 2003 to 2011, which gives us 1006 firm-year observations in total. We find strong support for our hypothesis of an inverted U shaped relationship between FII trading turnover and the extent of tunneling by controlling shareholders. ududTheoretical/Academic Implications: In many emerging economies, the institutional environments for investor protection are weak. Powerful controlling shareholders may take the opportunity to extract private benefits via tunneling activities to the detriment of minority shareholders, and informed minority investors may also take advantage of less well-informed investors. There are thus multiple principal-principal agency conflicts. FIIs are a particularly important group of informed investors. On the one hand, large-scale aggressive trading by FIIs should drive stock prices to fundamentals, provide market discipline to management, and thus limit tunneling. On the other hand, FIIs may opt to exploit their private knowledge to gain trading profits at the expense of uninformed investors, and implicitly support tunneling. We highlight these potential effects, and demonstrate empirically an inverted U-shaped relationship between FII trading turnover and the extent of tunneling.ududPractitioner/Policy Implications: Tunneling is a serious issue, particularly in emerging economies where the institutional arrangements for minority investor protection are often weak. FII involvement may enhance market discipline, but may also exacerbate the problem so policy-makers need to guard against potential adverse effects. An ownership cap on FII shareholdings is unlikely to be effective, but policy-makers might strengthen QFII license revocation policies and issue more licenses to promote competition among FIIs
机译:研究问题/问题:本文调查了外国机构投资者(FII)的交易活动如何影响新兴经济体(中国)控制股东的隧道活动。 ud udresearch发现/见解:我们使用167的不平衡面板数据集在2003年至2011年期间,在2003年至2011年期间投资中国房地产公司,这为我们提供了1006年的牢固观测。我们发现强烈支持我们对股票股东之间的倒立U形关系的假设和控制股东隧道的程度。 ud ud udtheorative /学术影响:在许多新兴经济体中,投资者保护的制度环境疲软。强大的控股股东可能借此机会通过隧道活动提取私人福利,以损害少数股东,知情少数民族投资者也可能利用不太通知的投资者。因此,多个校长机构冲突。 FII是一群特别重要的知情投资者。一方面,FII的大规模侵略性交易应该将股票价格推向基本面,为管理层提供市场学科,从而限制隧道。另一方面,FIIS可以选择利用他们的私人知识以获得不知情的投资者的费用,并隐含地支持隧道的交易利润。我们突出了这些潜在的效果,并经验证明了FII交易营业额与隧道的程度之间的倒立U形关系。 UD UDPRACTINGER /政策影响:隧道是一个严重的问题,特别是在新兴经济体中,少数民族投资者的制度安排保护通常很弱。 FII参与可能会增强市场纪律,但也可能加剧问题,因此政策制定者需要防止潜在的不利影响。 FII股权的所有权上限不太可能是有效的,但政策制定者可能会加强QFII许可撤销政策,并颁发更多的许可证,以促进FIIS之间的竞争

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号