首页> 外文OA文献 >Response control of structural systems using semi-actively controlled interactions
【2h】

Response control of structural systems using semi-actively controlled interactions

机译:使用半主动控制相互作用的结构系统响应控制

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The objective of the research described herein is to demonstrate conditions under which controlled interactions between two structures or structural components can be made effective in reducing the response of structures that are subjected to seismic excitation. It is shown that the effectiveness depends upon such factors as the control strategy implementation, the interaction element mechanical properties, and the parameters which characterize the dynamic behavior of the structural systems.A study is conducted to examine the performance of a structural response control approach referred to as Active Interface Damping (AID). This control approach utilizes controlled interactions between two distinct structural systems - or different components of a single structural system - to reduce the resonance buildup that develops during an external excitation. Control devices or elements may be employed to physically produce the interactions between the systems. The proposed control approach differs from some other control approaches in that the sensors, processors, and switching components all operate actively, whereas the interaction elements function passively. The major advantage of this semi-active control technology is that relatively large control forces can be generated with minimal power requirements, which is of prime importance for the control of relatively massive systems, such as structures.In the most simple form, the strategy of the control approach is to remove energy associated with vibration from only one system (the primary system). This process is accomplished through the transfer of energy to another system (the auxiliary system) by means of interaction elements, the dissipation of energy directly in the interaction elements, or a combination of both these methods. In a more complex form, the control strategy may be to minimize some composite response measure of the combined primaryauxiliary system. Only the most simple form of the control strategy is considered in the present study.Several physical interpretations of the control approach are possible: one is that the systems represent two adjacent multi-story buildings; another is that the primary system represents a single multi-story building, while the auxiliary system could represent either an externally-situated resilient frame or a relatively small, unrestrained mass - or even be completely absent (in this latter scenario, the interaction elements are internally mounted control devices). The interactions consist of reaction forces that are developed within and transmitted through the elements which are located between the two systems (or different points of a single system). The mechanical properties of these elements can be altered in real time by control signals, so the reaction forces applied to the systems may be changed, and the response control objective is achieved by actively changing the interactions at the interface of the two systems (or different points of a single system).Initially, a preliminary study of the proposed control approach is conducted within the specialized setting of linear single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) primary and auxiliary systems. Numerical simulations are performed for a series of control cases using horizontal ground accelerations from an ensemble of earthquake time histories as excitation input. Subsequently, a follow-on study of the proposed control approach is conducted for linear multiple-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) primary and auxiliary systems intended to represent actual structural systems. Based upon the investigation and insight obtained from the preliminary study, a limited number of control cases are considered which include those deemed most effective and implementable. Numerical simulations are again performed using the same excitation input as for the SDOF systems. The control approach is targeted at reducing the response contribution from the fundamental or dominant mode of vibration associated with the primary system. Uniformly-discretized models of a 6-story primary structural system capable of only lateral deformations are considered in most cases. A few cases involving models of a 3-story primary structural system are also examined.
机译:本文所述研究的目的是证明条件,在该条件下,可以使两个结构或结构部件之间的受控相互作用有效地降低经受地震激励的结构的响应。结果表明,有效性取决于诸如控制策略的实施,相互作用元件的机械性能以及表征结构系统动态行为的参数等因素。进行了一项研究,以检验结构响应控制方法的性能。作为活动接口阻尼(AID)。这种控制方法利用了两个不同结构系统(或单个结构系统的不同组件)之间的受控相互作用,以减少在外部激励过程中形成的共振积累。可以采用控制装置或元件来物理地产生系统之间的相互作用。所提出的控制方法与其他一些控制方法的不同之处在于,传感器,处理器和开关组件均主动运行,而交互元素则被动运行。这种半主动控制技术的主要优势在于可以以最小的功率需求产生相对较大的控制力,这对于控制相对大型系统(例如结构)而言至关重要。控制方法是仅从一个系统(主系统)中消除与振动相关的能量。该过程是通过借助交互元素将能量转移到另一个系统(辅助系统),直接在交互元素中耗散能量或将这两种方法结合起来完成的。在更复杂的形式中,控制策略可能是最小化组合的初级辅助系统的某些复合响应度量。本研究仅考虑最简单的控制策略形式。对控制方法的几种物理解释是可能的:一种是系统代表两个相邻的多层建筑物;另一种是系统代表两个相邻的多层建筑物。另一个是主系统代表一栋多层建筑,而辅助系统可以代表外部弹性框架或相对较小,不受约束的物体-甚至完全不存在(在后一种情况下,交互元素是内部安装的控制设备)。相互作用由反作用力组成,这些反作用力在位于两个系统(或单个系统的不同点)之间的元素内发展并通过它们传递。这些元素的机械性能可以通过控制信号实时更改,因此可以更改施加到系统上的反作用力,并通过主动更改两个系统(或不同系统)之间的交互作用来实现响应控制目标。最初,在线性单自由度(SDOF)主系统和辅助系统的特殊设置下,对建议的控制方法进行了初步研究。使用一系列地震时间历史记录中的水平地面加速度作为激励输入,对一系列控制案例进行了数值模拟。随后,针对拟代表实际结构系统的线性多自由度(MDOF)主系统和辅助系统,对所提出的控制方法进行了后续研究。根据从初步研究中获得的调查和见识,考虑了数量有限的控制案例,其中包括被认为最有效和可实施的控制案例。再次使用与SDOF系统相同的激励输入进行数值模拟。该控制方法旨在减少与主系统相关的基本或主导振动模式的响应贡献。在大多数情况下,只考虑横向变形的6层主结构系统的均匀离散模型。还研究了一些涉及三层主要结构系统模型的案例。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hayen Jeffrey Clyde;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1995
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号