首页> 外文OA文献 >Emoji as Affective Symbols: Affective Judgments of Emoji, Emoticons, and Human Faces Varying in Emotional Content
【2h】

Emoji as Affective Symbols: Affective Judgments of Emoji, Emoticons, and Human Faces Varying in Emotional Content

机译:Emoji作为情感符号:表情符号,表情符号和人类面临情感概念的情感判断

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

An important function of emoji as communicative symbols is to convey emotional content from sender to receiver in computer-mediated communication, e. g., WhatsApp. However, compared with real faces, pictures or words, many emoji are ambiguous because they do not symbolize a discrete emotion or feeling state. Thus, their meaning relies on the context of the message in which they are embedded. Previous studies investigated affective judgments of pictures, faces, and words suggesting that these stimuli show a typical distribution along the big two emotion dimensions of valence and arousal. Also, emoji and emoticons have been investigated recently for their affective significance. The present study extends previous research by investigating affective ratings of emoji, emoticons and human faces and by direct comparison between them. In total, 60 stimuli have been rated by 83 participants (eight males, age: 18–49 years), using the non-verbal Self-Assessment Manikin Scales for valence and arousal. The emotionality of the stimuli was measured on a 9-point Likert scale. The results show significant main effects of the factors “stimulus category” and “discrete emotion” including emotionality, valence and arousal. Also, the interaction between these two main factors was significant. Emoji elicited highest arousal, whereas stimuli related to happiness were rated highest in valence across stimulus categories. Angry emoji were rated highest in emotionality. Also, the discrete emotion was best recognized in emoji, followed by human face stimuli and lastly emoticons.
机译:Emoji作为交流符号的一个重要功能是将发送者传达给计算机介导的通信中的发件人的情绪内容,例如。 g。,whatsapp。然而,与真正的面孔,图片或单词相比,许多表情符号是模糊的,因为它们并不象征着离散的情绪或感觉状态。因此,它们的含义依赖于它们嵌入的信息的上下文。以前的研究调查了对图片,面孔和言语的情感判断,表明这些刺激展示了沿着价值和唤醒的两种情绪尺寸的典型分布。此外,最近已经调查了表情符号和表情符号的情感意义。本研究通过调查表情符号,表情符号和人面的情感评级以及通过它们之间的直接比较来扩展先前的研究。总共有60名参与者(八名男性,年龄:18-49岁)评分60种刺激,使用非言语自我评估Manikin尺度为价和唤醒。刺激的情绪在9点李克特量表上测量。结果表明,因素“刺激类别”和“离散情绪”,包括情感,价值和唤醒等因素的主要影响。此外,这两个主要因素之间的相互作用是显着的。 Emoji引发最高唤醒,而与幸福有关的刺激,以刺激类别的价值最高。愤怒的表情符号在情绪中被评为最高。此外,离散情绪在表情符号中最受认可,其次是人脸刺激,最深刻的表情符号。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号