首页> 外文OA文献 >Stroke Risk Status, Anticoagulation Treatment, and Quality-of-Life in Chinese Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: China Registry of Atrial Fibrillation (CRAF)
【2h】

Stroke Risk Status, Anticoagulation Treatment, and Quality-of-Life in Chinese Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: China Registry of Atrial Fibrillation (CRAF)

机译:中风风险状态,抗凝治疗和中国心房颤动患者的生活质量:中国心房颤动(CRAF)注册机构

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective. To investigate the contemporary status of stroke risk profile, antithrombotic treatment, and quality-of-life (QoL) of patients with all types of atrial fibrillation (AF) in China. Design. This is a multicenter, cross-sectional study. Setting. Tertiary (80%) and Tier 2 hospitals (20%) were identified in different economic regions (Northeast, East, West, and Middle) by using a simple random sampling. Participants. A total of 3562 (85.6%) patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and 599 (14.4%) with rheumatic valvular atrial fibrillation (VAF) were consecutively enrolled from 111 hospitals from July 2012 to December 2012. Data Collection. Patient information was collected and QoL was assessed using Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire. Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures. The risk of stroke was assessed using the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc. QoL was assessed using Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 questionnaire. Results. Overall, 31.7% of the patients received anticoagulant treatment and 61.2% received antiplatelet treatment. The rate of anticoagulant treatment was higher in patients with VAF than in those with NVAF. The anticoagulant use was the lowest in Northeast and the highest in Middle regions. Independent risk factors associated with underuse of anticoagulants for NVAF were age, systolic blood pressure (SBP), non-Middle regions, nontertiary hospitals, and new-onset or paroxysmal AF. For VAF patients, the independent factors were age, paroxysmal AF, treatment in Tier 2 hospitals, SBP, diastolic blood pressure, history of coronary artery disease, and nonreceipt of antiarrhythmic therapy. Patients receiving anticoagulants fared significantly better in some QoL domains than those who received no antithrombotic therapy. Conclusions. These findings suggest that antiplatelet treatment is overused and anticoagulant treatment is underused both in Chinese patients with VAF and NVAF, even though usage of anticoagulants is associated with better QoL. Risk factors with underuse of anticoagulants were not identical in patients with NVAF and VAF.
机译:客观的。为了研究的患者中风风险,抗血栓治疗,和质量的生活(生活质量)的当代状态与所有类型的房颤(AF)是在中国。设计。这是一项多中心,横断面研究。环境。第三(80%)和Tier 2家医院(20%)是通过使用简单随机抽样在不同的经济区域(东北部,东部,西部和中东)标识。参与者。总共有3562(85.6%)患者的非瓣膜性房颤(NVAF)和599(14.4%),风湿性瓣膜性房颤(VAF)是连续参加从111家医院从2012年7月至2012年12月的数据收集。患者信息收集和生活质量,使用短表36健康调查(SF-36)评估问卷。主要和次要结局措施。中风的风险是使用CHADS2和CHA2DS2-VASC评估。生活质量是用医学结果研究SF-36问卷评估。结果。总体来说,患者31.7%接受抗凝治疗,并接受抗血小板治疗61.2%。抗凝治疗率在患者VAF比那些非瓣膜性房颤较高。抗凝血剂的使用是在东北地区最低,在中东地区最高的。抗凝血剂的非瓣膜性房颤的使用不足的独立危险因素有年龄,收缩压(SBP),非中东地区,医院非叔和新发或阵发性房颤。对于VAF患者的独立危险因素有年龄,阵发性房颤,治疗在二级医院,收缩压,舒张压,冠心病史,nonreceipt抗心律失常治疗。接受抗凝治疗的患者在一些领域生活质量谁比那些没有接受抗凝治疗表现显著较好。结论。这些结果表明,抗血小板治疗过度使用和抗凝治疗在中国患者VAF和非瓣膜性房颤未充分利用双方,即使抗凝血剂的使用量与更好的生活质量有关。风险因素与抗凝血剂的使用不足没有患者非瓣膜性房颤和VAF相同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号