首页> 外文OA文献 >Who pays and who benefits from health care? An assessment of equity in health care financing and benefit distribution in Tanzania.
【2h】

Who pays and who benefits from health care? An assessment of equity in health care financing and benefit distribution in Tanzania.

机译:谁付款,谁从医疗保健中受益?坦桑尼亚医疗保健筹资和利益分配公平性评估。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Little is known about health system equity in Tanzania, whether in terms of distribution of the health care financing burden or distribution of health care benefits. This study undertook a combined analysis of both financing and benefit incidence to explore the distribution of health care benefits and financing burden across socio-economic groups. A system-wide analysis of benefits was undertaken, including benefits from all providers irrespective of ownership. The analysis used the household budget survey (HBS) from 2001, the most recent nationally representative survey data publicly available at the time, to analyse the distribution of health care payments through user fees, health insurance contributions [from the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) for the formal sector and the Community Health Fund (CHF), for the rural informal sector] and taxation. Due to lack of information on NHIF and CHF contributions in the HBS, a primary survey was administered to estimate CHF enrollment and contributions; assumptions were used to estimate NHIF contributions within the HBS. Data from the same household survey, administered to 2224 households in seven districts/councils, was used to analyse the distribution of health care benefits across socio-economic groups. The health financing system was mildly progressive overall, with income taxes and NHIF contributions being the most progressive financing sources. Out-of-pocket payments and contributions to the CHF were regressive. The health benefit distribution was fairly even but the poorest received a lower share of benefits relative to their share of need for health care. Public primary care facility use was pro-poor, whereas higher level and higher cost facility use was generally pro-rich. We conclude that health financing reforms can improve equity, so long as integration of health insurance schemes is promoted along with cross-subsidization and greater reliance on general taxation to finance health care for the poorest.
机译:坦桑尼亚对卫生系统公平性知之甚少,无论是在卫生保健筹资负担的分配方面还是在卫生保健福利的分配方面。这项研究对筹资和福利发生率进行了综合分析,以探索医疗福利和社会经济群体之间的筹资负担。对收益进行了全系统分析,包括所有提供者的收益,不论所有权如何。该分析使用了2001年的家庭预算调查(HBS)(当时公开提供的最新的具有全国代表性的调查数据)来分析通过使用费,健康保险缴费[来自国家健康保险基金(NHIF) )(针对正规部门)和社区卫生基金(CHF)(针对农村非正规部门)和税收。由于缺乏有关HBS中NHIF和CHF捐款的信息,因此进行了一次初步调查以估算CHF的注册人数和捐款。假设用于估算HBS中的NHIF贡献。来自同一家庭调查的数据适用于七个地区/理事会的2224户家庭,用于分析社会经济群体中医疗保健福利的分布。卫生筹资系统总体上是温和渐进的,所得税和NHIF捐款是最渐进的筹资来源。现款支付和对瑞士法郎的捐款是递减的。健康福利分配相当平均,但是最贫穷的人所获得的福利份额相对于他们对医疗保健的需求份额较低。公共初级保健设施的使用有利于穷人,而较高水平和较高成本的设施使用通常有利于富人。我们得出的结论是,只要促进健康保险计划的整合以及交叉补贴和更大程度地依靠一般税收来为最贫困者提供医疗服务,健康融资改革就可以改善公平性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号