首页> 外文期刊>Health policy and planning >Factors influencing the burden of health care financing and the distribution of health care benefits in Ghana, Tanzania and South Africa
【24h】

Factors influencing the burden of health care financing and the distribution of health care benefits in Ghana, Tanzania and South Africa

机译:在加纳,坦桑尼亚和南非影响卫生保健筹资负担和卫生保健福利分配的因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In Ghana, Tanzania and South Africa, health care financing is progressive overall. However, out-of-pocket payments and health insurance for the informal sector are regressive. The distribution of health care benefits is generally pro-rich. This paper explores the factors influencing these distributions in the three countries. Qualitative data were collected through focus group discussions and in-depth interviews with insurance scheme members, the uninsured, health care providers and managers. Household surveys were also conducted in all countries. Flat-rate contributions contributed to the regressivity of informal sector voluntary schemes, either by design (in Tanzania) or due to difficulties in identifying household income levels (in Ghana). In all three countries, the regressivity of out-of-pocket payments is due to the incomplete enforcement of exemption and waiver policies, partial or no insurance cover among poorer segments of the population and limited understanding of entitlements among these groups. Generally, the pro-rich distribution of benefits is due to limited access to higher level facilities among poor and rural populations, who rely on public primary care facilities and private pharmacies. Barriers to accessing health care include medical and transport costs, exacerbated by the lack of comprehensive insurance coverage among poorer groups. Service availability problems, including frequent drug stock-outs, limited or no diagnostic equipment, unpredictable opening hours and insufficient skilled staff also limit service access. Poor staff attitudes and lack of confidence in the skills of health workers were found to be important barriers to access. Financing reforms should therefore not only consider how to generate funds for health care, but also explicitly address the full range of affordability, availability and acceptability barriers to access in order to achieve equitable financing and benefit incidence patterns. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
机译:在加纳,坦桑尼亚和南非,卫生保健筹资总体上是渐进的。但是,非正规部门的自付费用和健康保险是递减的。保健福利的分配通常是富裕的。本文探讨了影响这三个国家中这些分布的因素。通过焦点小组讨论和与保险计划成员,未投保者,医疗保健提供者和管理者的深入访谈收集定性数据。在所有国家也进行了住户调查。固定费率的捐款是通过设计(在坦桑尼亚)或由于难以确定家庭收入水平(在加纳)而导致非正规部门自愿计划的回归。在这三个国家中,自付费用的退步性归因于免税和豁免政策的不完全执行,较贫困人口部分或根本没有保险,以及这些群体对权利的理解有限。通常,有利于富人的利益分配是由于穷人和农村人口(他们依靠公共初级保健设施和私人药房)无法获得较高级别的设施。获得医疗保健的障碍包括医疗和运输费用,较贫穷的人群缺乏全面的保险覆盖而加剧了这种情况。服务可用性问题,包括频繁的药品库存短缺,诊断设备有限或没有诊断,开放时间无法预测以及技术人员不足,也限制了服务的获取。工作人员态度差和对卫生工作者技能缺乏信心被认为是获得卫生服务的重要障碍。因此,筹资改革不仅应考虑如何为卫生保健筹集资金,而且应明确解决获取方面的所有可负担性,可得性和可接受性障碍,以实现公平的筹资和惠益发生模式。牛津大学出版社与伦敦卫生与热带医学院联合出版

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号