首页> 外文OA文献 >A systematic review of triage-related interventions to improve patient flow in emergency departments
【2h】

A systematic review of triage-related interventions to improve patient flow in emergency departments

机译:对分诊相关干预措施进行系统回顾,以改善急诊科的患者流量

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background Overcrowding in emergency departments is a worldwide problem. A systematic literature review was undertaken to scientifically explore which interventions improve patient flow in emergency departments. Methods A systematic literature search for flow processes in emergency departments was followed by assessment of relevance and methodological quality of each individual study fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Studies were excluded if they did not present data on waiting time, length of stay, patients leaving the emergency department without being seen or other flow parameters based on a nonselected material of patients. Only studies with a control group, either in a randomized controlled trial or in an observational study with historical controls, were included. For each intervention, the level of scientific evidence was rated according to the GRADE system, launched by a WHO-supported working group. Results The interventions were grouped into streaming, fast track, team triage, point-of-care testing (performing laboratory analysis in the emergency department), and nurse-requested x-ray. Thirty-three studies, including over 800,000 patients in total, were included. Scientific evidence on the effect of fast track on waiting time, length of stay, and left without being seen was moderately strong. The effect of team triage on left without being seen was relatively strong, but the evidence for all other interventions was limited or insufficient. Conclusions Introducing fast track for patients with less severe symptoms results in shorter waiting time, shorter length of stay, and fewer patients leaving without being seen. Team triage, with a physician in the team, will probably result in shorter waiting time and shorter length of stay and most likely in fewer patients leaving without being seen. There is only limited scientific evidence that streaming of patients into different tracks, performing laboratory analysis in the emergency department or having nurses to request certain x-rays results in shorter waiting time and length of stay.
机译:背景技术紧急部门的人满为患是一个世界性的问题。进行了系统的文献综述,以科学地探索哪些干预措施可改善急诊科的患者流量。方法对急诊科流程进行系统的文献检索,然后评估符合纳入标准的每项研究的相关性和方法学质量。如果研究没有提供有关等待时间,住院时间,未见到急诊科的患者的数据或其他基于非选定患者材料的流量参数,则将其排除在研究范围之外。仅包括对照组的研究,无论是在随机对照试验中还是在有历史对照的观察性研究中。对于每种干预措施,根据WHO支持的工作组启动的GRADE系统对科学证据的等级进行了评级。结果干预措施分为流式,快速通道,团队分类,现场检查(在急诊室进行实验室分析)和护士要求的X射线。纳入了33项研究,包括总共80万多名患者。关于快速跟踪对等待时间,停留时间和不被发现离开的影响的科学证据是中等强度的。团队分类对不可见的左手的影响相对较强,但所有其他干预措施的证据有限或不足。结论为症状较轻的患者引入快速通道可以缩短等待时间,缩短住院时间,减少患者的出诊率。在团队中有医师的团队分类可能会缩短等待时间,缩短住院时间,最有可能导致更少的患者不见就诊。仅有有限的科学证据表明,将患者分流到不同的地方,在急诊室进行实验室分析或让护士要求某些X射线会缩短等待时间和住院时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号