首页> 外文OA文献 >Paramedic Pain Management Practice with Introduction of a Non-opiate Treatment Protocol
【2h】

Paramedic Pain Management Practice with Introduction of a Non-opiate Treatment Protocol

机译:辅助态疼痛管理实践,引入非阿片治疗方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Introduction: There is concern about the initiation of opiates in healthcare settings due to the risk of future misuse. Although opiate medications have historically been at the core of prehospital pain management, several states are introducing non-opiate alternatives to prehospital care. Prior studies suggest that non-opiate analgesics are non-inferior to opiates for many acute complaints, yet there is little literature describing practice patterns of pain management in prehospital care. Our goal was to describe the practice patterns and attitudes of paramedics toward pain management after the introduction of non-opiates to a statewide protocol. Methods: This study was two-armed. The first arm employed a pre/post retrospective chart review model examining medication administrations reported to the Massachusetts Ambulance Trip Information System between January 1, 2017–December 31, 2018. We abstracted instances of opiate and non-opiate utilizations along with patients’ clinical course. The second arm consisted of a survey administered to paramedics one year after implementation of non-opiates in the state protocol, which used binary questions and Likert scales to describe beliefs pertaining to prehospital analgesia. Results: Pain medications were administered in 1.6% of emergency medical services incidents in 2017 and 1.7% of incidents in 2018. The rate of opiate analgesic use was reduced by 9.4% in 2018 compared to 2017 (90.6% vs 100.0%). The absolute reduction in opiate use in 2018 was 3.6%. Women were less likely (odds ratio [OR] = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69–0.89) and trauma patients were more likely to receive opiates (OR = 2.36, CI, 1.96–2.84). Mean transport times were longer in opiate administration incidents (36.97 vs 29.35 minutes, t = 17.34, p<0.0001). We surveyed 100 paramedics (mean age 41.98, 84% male). Compositely, 85% of paramedics planned to use non-opiates and 35% reported having done so. Participants planning to use non-opiates were younger and less experienced. Participants indicated that concern about adverse effects, efficacy, and time to effect impacted their practice patterns. Conclusion: The introduction of non-opiate pain medication to state protocols led to reduced opiate administration. Men and trauma patients were more likely to receive opiates. Paramedics reported enthusiasm for non-opiate medications. Beliefs about non-opioid analgesics pertaining to adverse effects, onset time, and efficacy may influence their utilization.
机译:简介:有一个关于在医疗机构中的阿片类药物引发关注,因为未来的滥用的风险。虽然阿片类药物在历史上一直在院前疼痛管理的核心,一些国家正在引进非阿片类药物替代院前急救。此前的研究表明,非阿片类镇痛药不劣于阿片类药物许多尖锐的投诉,尚未有描述院前急救疼痛管理的实践模式文献很少。我们的目标是引进非阿片类药物对全州后的协议描述的实践模式和对疼痛管理护理人员的态度。方法:这项研究是两个武装。采用了前/后追溯图审查模型研究药物管理部门的第一臂2018年2017年1月1日 - 12月31日之间报马萨诸塞救护车旅行信息系统我们抽象鸦片和非鸦片类利用率的情况下,与患者的临床过程沿。第二臂包括给予护理人员执行的状态协议,使用二进制的问题和李克特量表来形容属于院前镇痛信仰非阿片类药物一年后的调查。结果:止痛药是在紧急医疗服务事件的1.6%,在2017年的行政管理和2018年事故减少阿片类镇痛药的使用率为9.4%,2018年相比2017年(90.6%和100.0%)的1.7%。绝对减少阿片类药物的使用在2018年为3.6%。妇女不太可能(比值比[OR] = 0.78,95%置信区间[CI],0.69-0.89)和创伤患者更可能接受阿片类药物(OR = 2.36,Cl,1.96-2.84)。平均传输时间阿片管理事件是更长(36.97 VS29.35分钟,T = 17.34,P <0.0001)。我们调查的100名医务人员(平均年龄41.98,84%为男性)。复合地,医护人员的85%计划使用非阿片类药物,并报告了35%,如此做。参加计划使用非阿片类药物是年轻和缺乏经验。与会者表示的不利影响,效果这一问题,和时间效应影响了他们的实践模式。结论:引入非阿片类止痛药物,以导致减少阿片类药物管理状态协议。男人和外伤患者更可能接受阿片类药物。医护人员报告非阿片类药物的积极性。约有关的不良影响,发病时间非阿片类镇痛药和效能信念会影响他们的利用率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号