首页> 外文OA文献 >Combining rTMS With Intensive Language-Action Therapy in Chronic Aphasia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
【2h】

Combining rTMS With Intensive Language-Action Therapy in Chronic Aphasia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:将RTM与强化语言 - 动作治疗结合在慢性开发症中:随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Neuromodulation technologies, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), are promising tools for neurorehabilitation, aphasia therapy included, but not yet in common clinical use. Combined with behavioral techniques, in particular treatment-efficient Intensive Language-Action Therapy (ILAT, previously CIAT or CILT), TMS could substantially amplify the beneficial effect of such behavioral therapy alone (Thiel et al., 2013; Martin et al., 2014; Mendoza et al., 2016; Kapoor, 2017). In this randomized study of 17 subjects with post-stroke aphasia in the chronic stage, we studied the combined effect of ILAT and 1-Hz placebo-controlled navigated repetitive TMS (rTMS) to the right-hemispheric inferior frontal cortex—that is, to the anterior part of the non-dominant hemisphere's homolog Broca's area (pars triangularis). Patients were randomized to groups A and B. Patients in group A received a 2-week period of rTMS during naming training where they named pictures displayed on the screen once every 10 s, followed by 2 weeks of rTMS and naming combined with ILAT. Patients in group B received the same behavioral therapy but TMS was replaced by sham stimulation. The primary outcome measures for changes in language performance were the Western Aphasia Battery's aphasia quotient AQ; the secondary outcome measures were the Boston naming test (BNT) and the Action naming test (Action BNT, ANT). All subjects completed the study. At baseline, no statistically significant group differences were discovered for age, post-stroke time or diagnosis. ILAT was associated with significant improvement across groups, as documented by both primary and secondary outcome measures. No significant effect of rTMS could be documented. Our results agree with previous results proving ILAT's ability to improve language in patients with chronic aphasia. In contrast with earlier claims, however, a beneficial effect of rTMS in chronic post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation was not detected in this study.Clinical Trial Registration:www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03629665
机译:诸如经颅磁刺激(TMS)之类的神经调节技术是对神经环境的有前途的工具,包括临床疗法,但尚未在常见的临床中使用。结合行为技术,特别是治疗有效的强化语言 - 动作治疗(ILAT,先前的CIAT或CILT),TMS可以基本上仅扩增这种行为疗法的有益效果(Thiel等,2013; Martin等,2014年,2014年; Mendoza等人。,2016; Kapoor,2017)。在17名受试者在慢性期后冲程失语这个随机研究中,我们研究了ILAT的到右半球下额叶皮质,也就是说,到组合效果和1Hz的安慰剂对照的导航重复TMS(磁刺激)非占主导地点的同源物的前部(Pars Triangularis)。患者被随机分配到组A和B. A组患者命名训练期间收到的rTMS的2个星期内,他们命名的图片在屏幕每隔10秒就显示出来,随后2周的rTMS,并命名与ILAT结合。 B组患者接受了相同的行为治疗,但是假刺激取代了TMS。语言绩效变化的主要结果措施是西部阿骨电池的性腺素型推出;二次结果措施是波士顿命名试验(BNT)和动作命名试验(动作BNT,ANT)。所有受试者都完成了这项研究。在基线下,未发现统计学上显着的群体差异,卒中后的时间或诊断。由于初级和二次结果措施,伊拉特与跨群体的重大改善有关。无需记录RTMS的显着效果。我们的结果与以往的结果一致意见,证明了ilat改善慢性失语患者语言的能力。然而,与前面的权利要求相比,在本研究中未检测到RTMS在慢性卒中后性康复康复中的有益作用。注册:www.clinicaltrials.gov,标识符:nct03629665

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号