首页> 外文OA文献 >A new model of the global biogeochemical cycle of carbonyl sulfide – Part 2: Use of carbonyl sulfide to constrain gross primary productivity in current vegetation models
【2h】

A new model of the global biogeochemical cycle of carbonyl sulfide – Part 2: Use of carbonyl sulfide to constrain gross primary productivity in current vegetation models

机译:全球羰基硫生物地球化学循环的新模型–第2部分:使用羰基硫限制当前植被模型中的总初级生产力

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Clear analogies between carbonyl sulfide (OCS) and carbon dioxide (CO)diffusion pathways through leaves have been revealed by experimental studies,with plant uptake playing an important role for the atmospheric budget ofboth species. Here we use atmospheric OCS to evaluate the gross primaryproduction (GPP) of three dynamic global vegetation models (Lund–Potsdam–Jena, LPJ; National Center for Atmospheric Research – Community Land Model 4,NCAR-CLM4; and Organising Carbon and Hydrology In Dynamic Ecosystems, ORCHIDEE). Vegetation uptake of OCS is modeled as a linear function ofGPP and leaf relative uptake (LRU), the ratio of OCS to CO depositionvelocities of plants. New parameterizations for the non-photosynthetic sinks(oxic soils, atmospheric oxidation) and biogenic sources (oceans and anoxicsoils) of OCS are also provided. Despite new large oceanic emissions, globalOCS budgets created with each vegetation model show exceeding sinks byseveral hundred Gg S yr. An inversion of the surface fluxes(optimization of a global scalar which accounts for flux uncertainties) ledto balanced OCS global budgets, as atmospheric measurements suggest, mainlyby drastic reduction (up to −50 %) in soil and vegetation uptakes.The amplitude of variations in atmospheric OCS mixing ratios is mainlydictated by the vegetation sink over the Northern Hemisphere. This allowsfor bias recognition in the GPP representations of the three selectedmodels. The main bias patterns are (i) the terrestrial GPP of ORCHIDEE at highnorthern latitudes is currently overestimated, (ii) the seasonal variationsof the GPP are out of phase in the NCAR-CLM4 model, showing a maximum carbonuptake too early in spring in the northernmost ecosystems, (iii) the overallamplitude of the seasonal variations of GPP in NCAR-CLM4 is too small, and(iv) for the LPJ model, the GPP is slightly out of phase for the northernmostecosystems and the respiration fluxes might be too large in summer in theNorthern Hemisphere. These results rely on the robustness of the OCSmodeling framework and, in particular, the choice of the LRU values (assumedconstant in time) and the parameterization of soil OCS uptake with smallseasonal variations. Refined optimization with regional-scale and seasonallyvarying coefficients might help to test some of these hypothesis.
机译:实验研究揭示了羰基硫化物(OCS)与二氧化碳(CO)扩散途径之间的清晰类比,植物的吸收对这两种物种的大气平衡都起着重要作用。在这里,我们使用大气OCS来评估三种动态全球植被模型(隆德-波茨坦-耶拿,LPJ;国家大气研究中心-社区土地模型4,NCAR-CLM4;以及在动态中组织碳和水文学)的总初级生产力(GPP)。生态系统,兰花)。 OCS的植被吸收被建模为GPP和叶片相对吸收(LRU),OCS与植物CO沉积速度之比的线性函数。还为OCS的非光合作用汇(含氧土壤,大气氧化)和生物源(海洋和缺氧土壤)提供了新的参数设置。尽管海洋排放量增加,但每种植被模型创建的globalOCS预算都显示出超过100 Gg Syr的下沉量。正如大气测量所表明的那样,表面通量的反演(考虑通量不确定性的全球标量的优化)导致OCS全球预算平衡,主要是由于土壤和植被吸收量急剧减少(最多-50%)。大气OCS混合比主要由北半球的植被汇决定。这允许在三个所选模型的GPP表示中进行偏差识别。主要偏差模式是(i)当前北高纬度地区ORCHIDEE的地面GPP被高估了;(ii)NCAR-CLM4模型中GPP的季节变化异相,表明春季最北端的碳吸收最大。 (iii)NCAR-CLM4中GPP季节性变化的整体幅度太小,并且(iv)对于LPJ模型,对于最北端的生态系统GPP略有异相,并且夏季的呼吸通量可能太大在北半球。这些结果依赖于OCS建模框架的鲁棒性,尤其是LRU值的选择(假定时间恒定)以及土壤季节变化小时土壤OCS吸收的参数化。使用区域尺度和季节变化系数进行优化的优化可能有助于检验其中一些假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号