首页> 外文OA文献 >Life Cycle Assessment of Electric Vehicles and Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles Using the GREET Model—A Comparative Study
【2h】

Life Cycle Assessment of Electric Vehicles and Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles Using the GREET Model—A Comparative Study

机译:使用迎接模型 - 对比较研究的电动车辆和氢气燃料电池车的生命周期评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Facing global warming and recent bans on the use of diesel in vehicles, there is a growing need to develop vehicles powered by renewable energy sources to mitigate greenhouse gas and pollutant emissions. Among the various forms of non-fossil energy for vehicles, hydrogen fuel is emerging as a promising way to combat global warming. To date, most studies on vehicle carbon emissions have focused on diesel and electric vehicles (EVs). Emission assessment methodologies are usually developed for fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) which are non-durable household goods such as packaged foods, beverages, and toiletries instead of vehicle products. There is an increase in the number of articles addressing the product carbon footprint (PCF) of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in the recent years, while relatively little research focuses on both vehicle PCF and fuel cycle. Zero-emission vehicles initiative has also brought the importance of investigating the emission throughout the fuel cycle of hydrogen fuel cell and its environmental impact. To address these gaps, this study uses the life-cycle assessment (LCA) process of GREET (greenhouse gases, regulated emissions, and energy use in transportation) to compare the PCF of an EV (Tesla Model 3) and a hydrogen fuel cell car (Toyota MIRAI). According to the GREET results, the fuel cycle contributes significantly to the PCF of both vehicles. The findings also reveal the need for greater transparency in the disclosure of relevant information on the PCF methodology adopted by vehicle manufacturers to enable comparison of their vehicles’ emissions. Future work will include examining the best practices of PCF reporting for vehicles powered by renewable energy sources as well as examining the carbon footprints of hydrogen production technologies based on different methodologies.
机译:在车辆使用柴油面对全球变暖和最近的禁令,有越来越多的需要开发,采用可再生能源,减少温室气体和污染物排放的车辆。在车辆的各种形式的非化石能源,氢燃料正在成为应对全球变暖有前途的方法。迄今为止,对车辆的碳排放大部分研究都集中在柴油和电动汽车(EV)。排放评估方法通常是为快速消费品(FMCG),这些非耐用家庭用品,如包装食品,饮料和洗浴用品,而不是车辆的产品开发。有一个增加的条款解决近年来氢燃料电池汽车的产品碳足迹(PCF)的数量,而相对较少的研究主要集中在两车PCF和燃料循环。零排放汽车的做法也带来了整个调查的氢燃料电池的燃料循环和对环境的影响排放的重要性。为了解决这些缺陷,本研究使用生命周期评估(LCA)GREET的处理(温室气体,管制的排放,和在运输的能源使用)比较的EV的PCF(特斯拉模型3)和氢燃料电池车(丰田MIRAI)。按照GREET结果,燃料循环显著有助于两辆车的PCF。调查结果还揭示了在通过车辆制造商采用,使他们的车辆的排放量相比,PCF方法的相关信息的披露更加透明的需要。未来的工作将包括检查PCF报告的最佳实践,采用可再生能源以及研究的基础上不同的方法制氢技术的碳足迹车辆。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号