首页> 外文OA文献 >Scoping Reviews, Systematic Reviews, and Meta-Analysis: Applications in Veterinary Medicine
【2h】

Scoping Reviews, Systematic Reviews, and Meta-Analysis: Applications in Veterinary Medicine

机译:范围评论,系统性评论和荟萃分析:兽医中的应用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Evidence-based decision making is a hallmark of effective veterinary clinical practice. Scoping reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses all are methods intended to provide transparent and replicable ways of summarizing a body of research to address an important clinical or public health issue. As these methods increasingly are being used by researchers and read by practitioners, it is important to understand the distinction between these techniques and to understand what research questions they can, and cannot, address. This review provides an overview of scoping reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analysis, including a discussion of the method and uses. A sample dataset and coding to conduct a simple meta-analysis in the statistical program R also are provided. Scoping reviews are a descriptive approach, designed to chart the literature around a particular topic. The approach involves an extensive literature search, following by a structured mapping, or charting, of the literature. The results of scoping reviews can help to inform future research by identifying gaps in the existing literature and also can be used to identify areas where there may be a sufficient depth of literature to warrant a systematic review. Systematic reviews are intended to address a specific question by identifying and summarizing all of the available research that has addressed the review question. Questions types that can be addressed by a systematic review include prevalence/incidence questions, and questions related to etiology, intervention efficacy, and diagnostic test accuracy. The systematic review process follows structured steps with multiple reviewers working in parallel to reduce the potential for bias. An extensive literature search is undertaken and, for each relevant study identified by the search, a formal extraction of data, including the effect size, and assessment of the risk of bias is performed. The results from multiple studies can be combined using meta-analysis. Meta-analysis provides a summary effect size, and allows heterogeneity of effect among studies to be quantified and explored. These evidence synthesis approaches can provide scientific input to evidence-based clinical decision-making for veterinarians and regulatory bodies, and also can be useful for identifying gaps in the literature to enhance the efficiency of future research in a topic area.
机译:基于证据的决策是有效兽医临床实践的标志。划分的评论,系统性评论和Meta-Analys所有是旨在提供透明和可复制的方法,总结一系列研究,以解决重要的临床或公共卫生问题。由于这些方法越来越多地被研究人员使用并由从业者读取,因此了解这些技术之间的区别并理解他们可以的研究问题,不能,地址。此审查概述了范围,系统评价和荟萃分析,包括讨论该方法和用途。还提供了一个样本数据集和编码,以便在统计程序R中进行简单的元分析。范围评论是一种描述性的方法,旨在围绕特定主题绘制文献。该方法涉及广泛的文献搜索,遵循文献的结构化映射或图表。范围审查的结果可以通过识别现有文献中的差距来帮助向未来的研究通知未来的研究,也可用于识别可能有足够深度文学深度的区域来保证系统审查。系统评价旨在通过识别和总结所有已解决审查问题的所有可用研究来解决特定问题。系统审查可以解决的问题包括患病率/发病率问题,以及与病因,干预效能和诊断测试准确性有关的问题。系统审查过程遵循结构化的步骤,多个审阅者并行工作以减少偏差的可能性。进行广泛的文献搜索,对于搜索所识别的每个相关研究,进行正式提取数据,包括效果规模和对偏倚风险的评估。可以使用Meta分析组合多项研究的结果。 Meta分析提供了概述效果大小,并允许在研究中进行研究的异质性和探索的研究。这些证据综合方法可以为兽医和监管机构提供基于证据的临床决策的科学投入,也可用于识别文献中的差距,以提高一个主题领域的未来研究效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号