首页> 外文OA文献 >Futures in Education: Principles, practices and potential, monograph No 5, the strategic foresight monograph series
【2h】

Futures in Education: Principles, practices and potential, monograph No 5, the strategic foresight monograph series

机译:教育期货:原则,实践和潜力,专着5号,战略前瞻专着系列

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The notion of teaching and learning explicitly about futures in education is not new. It is well over thirty years since the first school and college classes were held. Since then many hundreds of school based innovations have subjected these initial ideas and practices to a variety of iterations and tests. What they collectively tell us is that young people are passionately interested in their own futures, and that of the society in which they live. They universally ‘jump at the chance’ to study something with such intrinsic interest that also intersects with their own life interests in so many ways. Will I get a job? Will the environment collapse? Will machines overrun us? These are some of the starting questions that often arise and, moreover, they are reinforced and answered (not always in useful or accessible ways) in popular culture. A common result is that young people become discouraged from even considering such questions; they rapidly fall into the ‘too hard’ basket.
机译:明确地关于教育中的未来进行教与学的概念并不是什么新鲜事物。自从第一次上大学和大学班以来,已有30多年的历史了。从那时起,数百项基于学校的创新使这些最初的思想和实践经历了各种迭代和测试。他们共同告诉我们,年轻人对自己的未来以及他们所生活的社会充满热情。他们普遍“跳上机会”去学习具有这种内在兴趣的事物,这些内在兴趣也以多种方式与自己的生活兴趣相交。我会找到工作吗?环境会崩溃吗?机器会超越我们吗?这些是一些经常出现的起始问题,此外,在流行文化中,这些问题已经得到了加强和回答(并非总是以有用或可访问的方式)。一个普遍的结果是,年轻人甚至不愿考虑这样的问题。他们迅速跌入“太难了”的篮子。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gidley J; Bateman D; Smith C;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2004
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号