首页> 外文OA文献 >Education as a way of love: answering the call of the other in the time of Gestell
【2h】

Education as a way of love: answering the call of the other in the time of Gestell

机译:教育作为一种爱的方式:在Gestell时代回应对方的呼​​唤

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This thesis is a transdisciplinary investigation into why, in spite of our best intentions, modern cultures continue to marginalise people and the other-than-human world, and the role that education has in this marginalisation. Firstly, the thesis explores the problems and paradoxes of modern thinking and how these shape educational practice. Beginning with Heidegger’s notion of Gestell, it illustrates how the object worldview, which is the basis of metaphysics, leads, not only to the idea of Bestand, or use, but also to assumptions about the naturalness of making and mastery, progress, praxis and the idea of an authentic, autonomous, free individuality. It explores how the entailments of this worldview share an underlying sameness that permeates seemingly opposing research paradigms and educational methods, a sameness that resonates with Thomas Berry’s concept of the millennial dream and the modern quest for transcendence. The Gestellian worldview is then contrasted with Indigenous, Buddhist and more recent scientific and social-scientific cosmologies that understand that we are not self-sufficient, self-constituting and self-ruling beings, but are intimately connected with others in such a way that we continuously bring one another into being. These cosmologies assume being as participatory and intersubjective, understanding that we do not come into being in silence, but rather in the cacophony of an entangled engagement that disrupts all plans and blueprints for personal freedoms and utopias, thus calling up in each of us, a sense of universal responsibility for a co-arising world. It is this assumption of an unvolitional, intimate engagement with the face of the other with whom we are always-already implicated that Lévinas calls ‘ethics as first philosophy’ and is here called a way of love. In education, as in life, we are called to remain continuously open and responsive to the face of the other – any other – before any responsibility to self, or method, or dream. Finally, the thesis explores how education practised as love without concupiscence (as opposed to education in the service of the dream) could have a very different appearance and a very different effect. The thesis revolves around Sammy/Sammi stories – critical incidents from the author’s own teaching/learning that exemplify the notion of learning as a way of love. It seeks to expose the silences in modern education – pain, risk, wound, forgiveness, promise, gift, joy – and depicts other ways of understanding learning: as feeling learning, as worlding, as enthrallment and as teaching/learning by heart.
机译:本论文是一个跨学科的研究,探讨了尽管有我们的最大意图,现代文化为何继续使人和人类以外的世界边缘化,以及教育在这种边缘化中所起的作用。首先,论文探讨了现代思维的问题和悖论,以及它们如何塑造教育实践。从海德格尔的“格斯特尔”概念开始,它说明了作为形而上学基础的客体世界观,不仅导致了贝斯坦或使用的思想,而且导致了关于创造和掌握的自然性,进步,实践和实践的假设。真实,自主,自由的个性的想法。它探索了这种世界观的内在联系如何共享看起来看似相反的研究范式和教育方法的内在相同性,这种相同性与托马斯·贝里(Thomas Berry)的千禧年梦想和现代的超越追求产生了共鸣。然后,将Gestellian的世界观与土著,佛教和较新的科学和社会科学宇宙论进行对比,后者理解我们不是自给自足,自我构成和自我统治的存在,而是与他人紧密联系,以至于我们不断地彼此产生。这些宇宙学假定是参与性的和主体间的,理解我们并不是默默地存在,而是纠缠不休的交织混乱,破坏了个人自由和乌托邦的所有计划和蓝图,因此在我们每个人中都呼吁对一个共同世界的普遍责任感。正是这样的假设,即我们一直以来都暗示着列维纳斯与他人的面孔保持着自愿,亲密的交往,列维纳斯称之为“道德为第一哲学”,在这里被称为一种爱的方式。在教育中,就像在生活中一样,我们被要求在对自我,方法或梦想承担任何责任之前,要保持持续开放并对他人(任何其他人)的面孔做出反应。最后,本文探索了如何将教育实践为没有悔改的爱(与为梦想服务的教育相对),可以有非常不同的外观和不同的效果。本文围绕Sammy / Sammi的故事展开,这些故事来自作者自己的教学/学习中的严重事件,这些事件例证了学习作为一种爱的方式的概念。它试图揭示现代教育中的沉默-痛苦,风险,创伤,宽恕,诺言,天赋,喜悦-并描绘其他理解学习的方式:感觉学习,世界化,迷恋和内心地教与学。

著录项

  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号