首页> 外文OA文献 >Report on a Boston University Conference December 7-8,ud2012 on 'How Can the History and Philosophy of ScienceudContribute to Contemporary U.S. Science Teaching?'
【2h】

Report on a Boston University Conference December 7-8,ud2012 on 'How Can the History and Philosophy of ScienceudContribute to Contemporary U.S. Science Teaching?'

机译:12月7日至8日波士顿大学会议报告, ud2012年“科学的历史和哲学怎么样”为当代美国科学教学做贡献?'

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This is an editorial report on the outcomes of an international conference sponsored by a grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF) (REESE-1205273) to the School of Education at Boston University and the Center for Philosophy and History of Science at Boston University for a conference titled: How Can the History and Philosophy of Science Contribute to Contemporary U.S. Science Teaching? The presentations of the conference speakers and the reports of the working groups are reviewed. Multiple themes emerged for K-16 education from the perspective of the history and philosophy of science. Key ones were that: students need to understand that central to science is argumentation, criticism, and analysis; students should be educated to appreciate science as part of our culture; students should be educated to be science literate; what is meant by the nature of science as discussed in much of the science education literature must be broadened to accommodate a science literacy that includes preparation for socioscientific issues; teaching for science literacy requires the development of new assessment tools; and, it is difficult to change what science teachers do in their classrooms. The principal conclusions drawn by the editors are that: to prepare students to be citizens in a participatory democracy, science education must be embedded in a liberal arts education; science teachers alone cannot be expected to prepare students to be scientifically literate; and, to educate students for scientific literacy will require a new curriculum that is coordinated across the humanities, history/social studies, and science classrooms.
机译:这是有关国际会议成果的社论报告,该会议是由美国国家科学基金会(NSF)(REESE-1205273)资助向波士顿大学教育学院和波士顿大学哲学与科学史中心赞助的一个名为“科学的历史和哲学如何对美国当代科学教学做出贡献”的会议?审查了会议发言人的发言和工作组的报告。从历史和科学哲学的角度来看,K-16教育出现了多个主题。关键是:学生需要理解科学的中心是论据,批评和分析;应教育学生欣赏科学作为我们文化的一部分;应该教育学生科学素养;在科学教育的许多文献中所讨论的科学本质是什么,必须扩大以适应科学素养,包括对社会科学问题的准备;科学素养教学需要开发新的评估工具;而且,很难改变科学老师在教室里所做的事情。编辑们得出的主要结论是:为了使学生成为参与性民主国家的公民,科学教育必须植根于文科教育之中;不能指望只有理科教师才能使学生具备科学素养。并且,为了教育学生科学素养,将需要一种新的课程,该课程应在人文,历史/社会研究和科学教室之间进行协调。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号